LATEST

ROTHENBURGER – Cutting size of council would save money, talk

Council in session on Tuesday.

Kamloops City council in session.

Note: I mentioned in Saturday’s ArmchairMayor column that I had previously raised the idea of reducing the number of Kamloops City councillors from eight to six. Following is the first of a two-part reprise. The column that follows was originally published March 1, 2014. It mentions that both Port Alberni and Lantzville were considering, at the time, reducing their number of councillors from six to four. Port Alberni council defeated a motion 2-5 on March 10, 2014 to hold a referendum in November 2014 on reducing the size of council. A referendum in Lantzville was approved 761 votes to 533 and its council will be reduced from a mayor and six councillors to a mayor and four councillors as of the civic election in 2018.

WHAT IF there were only six Kamloops City councillors instead of eight?

There’s nothing stopping it.

melcolhed-sep2016The Community Charter, the legislation governing City councils in B.C., sets the number of councillors at eight for cities with more than 50,000 people. Smaller communities have six or four councillors.

But councils are allowed to have fewer than the mandated number if they want. All they have to do is adopt a resolution saying so at least six months before the next election.

That means council could vote any time within the next two and a half months to reduce the number of councillors that would be elected in November to six for the following term. The Charter is a bit fuzzy on when a referendum is needed but council could always put it to a vote come election time.

There are benefits. Council voted itself a pay raise that takes effect after the next election. Terms in office were increased from three to four years by the provincial government this week — one stated reason was to save money.

Assuming council doesn’t give itself more raises during the next term, their salaries will total a little over $1.1 million.

Reducing the number of councillors to six would save about $193,000.

But, of course, the incumbents would no doubt insist there’s too much work for only six. Yet at least two B.C. councils are looking seriously at cutting themselves down to size.

Alberni City council will consider a motion March 10 to reduce itself from six to four councillors plus mayor after this year’s election, and the District of Lanztville is also looking at slimming down from six councillors to four.

The rationale is that, aside from money, fewer councillors would improve workflow and increase engagement.

“Just because it’s been a mayor and six councillors for all this time doesn’t mean that it has to stay this way,” Alberni councillor Rob Cole was quoted as saying in the Alberni Valley News a couple of days ago.

If you think politicians talk too much, well, fewer councillors should logically equal less total talking.

If you’re now thinking we should consider going even further and cutting the council in half, let’s not throw the baby out with the bath water. Keeping it at six would protect the City’s proportional representation on the Thompson-Nicola Regional District.

A little streamlining might be just the thing to up the production level at City Hall and save some money too.

mrothenburger@armchairmayor.ca

Mel Rothenburger's avatar
About Mel Rothenburger (11807 Articles)
ArmchairMayor.ca is a forum about Kamloops and the world. It has more than one million views. Mel Rothenburger is the former Editor of The Daily News in Kamloops, B.C. (retiring in 2012), and past mayor of Kamloops (1999-2005). At ArmchairMayor.ca he is the publisher, editor, news editor, city editor, reporter, webmaster, and just about anything else you can think of. He is grateful for the contributions of several local columnists. This blog doesn't require a subscription but gratefully accepts donations to help defray costs.

6 Comments on ROTHENBURGER – Cutting size of council would save money, talk

  1. I like it as it is now. More heads and ideas make better decisions.

    Like

  2. I’d prefer to see a ward system set up to ensure that we have representation and the interests kept in mind from all areas of the community. Not just from residents living on the South Shore.

    Like

  3. Unknown's avatar Ian McCulloch // December 4, 2016 at 10:11 AM // Reply

    how about no-one gets elected unless they have a minimum 40% of the total registered voters . Then if we only get a mayor and 3 council at least we would have some people that are trusted, Unlike this rabble we have where most of them are in with less than 10% of the registered voters and some less than 10% of the actual voters.

    Like

    • Nonsense! Are you telling me Singh and Christian are worth their votes? They did get many votes but their worth on council is highly (very highly actually) debatable.
      Let’s have a tally of their votes, the reasoning behind their votes and their contributions (ideas and proposals) to the well-being of the city. In case of Christian, he is even the airport authority president…have you been to the airport recently?

      Like

    • So then how do you suggest, we get the majority of eligible voters out to vote? If this “rabble” as you put it are getting in, then how do you suggest, we get quality people to run. We can blame this “rabble” for doing nothing ( which I don’t totally believe) but they are the only people running. If any of us think that that we can do a better job, if we have the finances to run and if our name is in the right place on the electoral ballot, then run.

      Like

  4. Some good thoughts on reducing the size of our City Council, especially when reducing the amount of talking that goes on around the council table, plus it would save the city some money. However, on the other hand, we have some Councillors, who say nothing, and in regards to the saving of money, the taxpayer might be saving money, but I am sure that city management will be able to find another area in our infrastructure that needs more taxpayer monies. Throwing a little more wood into the fire, let us take your six proposed Councillors and use the Ward system of government. But before we get too carried away with this idea, let us have a referendum on the matter, which is a great idea as long the city does not overrule the results as they have in the past.

    Like

Leave a reply to Ian McCulloch Cancel reply