LATEST

‘In for a penny, in for a pound’- council votes to pay for rest of Ajax study

Public works direct Jen Fretz, second from right, explains Ajax timeline to City council.

Public works direct Jen Fretz, second from right, explains Ajax timeline to City council.

“In for a penny, in for a pound,” was the way Mayor Peter Milobar put it today (Tuesday, Oct. 25, 2016) as Kamloops City councillors voted unanimously to take $200,000 from the general reserve fund to finish an independent study of the Ajax mine application.

Some councillors were more enthusiastic than others, but in view of KGHM’s refusal to write a cheque, they agreed it was the best move.

“I’m not surprised KGHM said no,” said Milobar, adding, “We’re in for a penny, in for a pound now as far as I’m concerned…. I say we’re far enough into this that we need to see it through to its end. We should be prepared to fund it.”

He pointed out that if KGHM had rejected paying the first $300,00 for the study, council was prepared at the time to hire SLR Consulting anyway “so we would have been on the hook for the whole shot.”

Coun. Dieter Dudy also said he wasn’t surprised by KGHM’s refusal to pay another $200,000, and wondered if “it’s time to cut our losses.”

Coun. Pat Walllace, who made the motion to draw the money from the general reserve fund, said, “We do have to move on.”

In May, the B.C. Environmental Assessment office approved a request from KGHM to put the review timeline on hold, but KGHM is expected to ask within a few weeks that it resume.

City public works director Jen Fretz said the 180-day timeframe was frozen at day 107. That leaves 73 days more but it doesn’t mean the City has 73 days to submit its comments to the BCEAO. She said the agency needs time to create reports for cabinet ministers, so the City will have more like a couple of weeks once the process is thawed.

“I would rather just vote against this whole project, but that’s not happening,” said Coun. Denis Walsh, who “reluctantly” supported Wallace’s motion.

Coun. Donovan Cavers was equally unhappy. “It’s very sad that KGHM won’t contribute to the ongoing work but it needs to happen.”

He had earlier tweeted that the community impact assessment was the ”cost of doing business” for KGHM and wrote, “Shame on KGHM.”

Coun. Marg Spina said she was “thankful taxpayers didn’t have to pay the $300,000 (originally the expected cost for the independent study, which KGHM paid for) and “I think it’s well worth it to get answers to the questions that people are wondering about.”

After the application review stage, the project will be referred to government for a decision within 45 days. At that point it could be approved, or not approved, which would either kill the project or result in further assessment.

Mel Rothenburger's avatar
About Mel Rothenburger (11736 Articles)
ArmchairMayor.ca is a forum about Kamloops and the world. It has more than one million views. Mel Rothenburger is the former Editor of The Daily News in Kamloops, B.C. (retiring in 2012), and past mayor of Kamloops (1999-2005). At ArmchairMayor.ca he is the publisher, editor, news editor, city editor, reporter, webmaster, and just about anything else you can think of. He is grateful for the contributions of several local columnists. This blog doesn't require a subscription but gratefully accepts donations to help defray costs.

2 Comments on ‘In for a penny, in for a pound’- council votes to pay for rest of Ajax study

  1. This council is totally corrupt. Who’s money do they think they are dealing with? Its completely diabolical that Walsh Lange and Cavers would make the comments they do and then partake in a vote to spend tax payer money. Its time to show up at city hall and take a stand. This has to stop!

    Like

  2. What the hey, eh ? It’s not our money, lets just blow some more for the heck of it.

    Like

Leave a reply to Grouchy 1 Cancel reply