Cost of arts centre vote questioned
By MIKE YOUDS
A $160,000 price tag for November’s performing arts centre referendum ballot was run through a wringer by some councillors on Tuesday but emerged unchanged.
The total includes $125,000 for assent voting and $35,000 for public information leading up to voting day Nov. 7. Council was asked to OK the spending as an amendment to the 2015-2019 financial plan. Both cost figures came under scrutiny.
A simple yes-no ballot should not require the same electronic balloting expense as a civic election and there may be savings in hiring more people to do a manual count, said Coun. Denis Walsh.
“Is there a more economical way rather than using expensive voting machines?”
Electronic balloting for the referendum will cost the City $28,500.
Walsh proposed an amendment to the recommendation that would have City staff consider whether manual ballot counting could save thousands of dollars. The motion failed with only councillors Donovan Cavers and Tina Lange supporting Walsh.
Walsh also questioned why so much money would be spent on public information when many people are already well aware of the matter.
“This is just to ensure that everybody has all the facts to go with it,” said Cindy Kennedy, who will serve as chief electoral officer.
The spending will also give greater assurance of a good voter turnout, said Tammy Robertson, business and client services manager. She said they’ve taken a page from capital projects management and built “a very good way to get the message out.”
“From what I’ve heard in the street, people are more than willing to turn out and vote,” Robertson said.
Other councillors agreed.
“I think it’s incumbent on us that we do everything in our power to inform people,” said Coun. Pat Wallace. “This is a critical issue for the city. Referendums are not inexpensive.”
Cavers wondered why the City needs to have fully staffed polling stations when referendum turnouts are generally lower than those of elections.
“Look at the percentage of $90 million spending to gauge the opinion of the community,” said Coun. Ken Christian. “It’s miniscule.” Cutting corners would do a disservice to democracy, he said.
Mayor Peter Milobar pointed to the 42 per cent turnout for the last City referendum, the Tournament Capital program 12 years ago. He also noted the roughly $1 million spent in every one of 300 federal electoral ridings to manually count ballots.
“I think at the end of the day the savings will be minimal if at all,” Milobar said of manual counting. He believes electronic counting produces a more accurate result.
Council voted unanimously in favour of staff recommendations to enact a loan authorization bylaw that would receive third and final reading only if the referendum passes. They also approved preparation of a bylaw for assent voting that will specify dates for advance voting, special voting at RIH and care homes and general voting.
Voters will be asked whether they are in favour of borrowing up to $49 million to construct the performing arts centre and a parkade at 393 Seymour St., the former Kamloops Daily News building. The remaining cost would be funded mostly through one-per-cent property tax hikes in 2016 and 2017.
Meanwhile, the City’s arts commission voted at its regular meeting on Monday to support the Yes side in the referendum, Walsh noted. The City will remain neutral on the question.
The critical flaw in the proposed 90 million dollar PAC is highlighted by proponents saying it’s not a 90 million PAC, as 30 M is for underground parking. They are going to have a hard time altering that perception no matter how much they spend on explaining it. Fact is the 2012 Downtown Parking Solutions effort described a need for 200 permanent parking stalls for downtown workers. So we are going with the most expensive kind of parking (underground) to meet this supposed need and spending 30 M in the process? My guess – and there are many variables – is that we could get 200 dedicated spaces in the downtown for a great deal less. We could also build the PAC for less – and I support the need for a PAC – by separating the two things – performing arts and parking. The city wants it’s cake and its pudding at the same meal. Do I sense the kind of arrogance and push it through mentality that sunk the Lorne Street underground parking proposal?
LikeLike
‘…everybody has all the facts to go with it…” All the facts or wishful thinking, aka daydreaming? Projecting that a 90-million-plus PAC will all of the sudden “put Kamloops on the map” is just silly talk by haughty people.
LikeLike
I vote yes for the performing arts centre……..however it amuses me to hear that the “City will remain neutral on the question”. Is there anything they “don’t” remain neutral on?
LikeLike
the PAC is Peter M baby. There is no way in….that council will be neutral.
LikeLike
So far, we have the cost of having the vote, then if it passes, we have $90 million to build and finally we have large question mark to the ongoing cost to operate this fantastic building and parking area. In regards to the 2 per cent rise in property tax spread out over 2016-2017. Is there any guarantee that property taxes will return to their original cost in 2015? Or will the 2% stay on the books.
LikeLike
“Look at the percentage of $90 million spending to gauge the opinion of the community,” said Coun. Ken Christian. “It’s miniscule.” Cutting corners would do a disservice to democracy, he said.
The only disservice is not following the results of referendum…remember the “NO” vote for water meters….the cost of meters was just washed away.
Vote no for the ” Milobar Mansion” aka performing arts centre.
LikeLike