LATEST

ROTHENBURGER — The best Ajax PR coup yet

Anti-Ajax video on fundraising website.

Anti-Ajax video on fundraising website.

COLUMN — KGHM Ajax has pulled off its best PR coup yet, and it cost only $5,000, a drop in the bucket compared to what the company’s spent so far trying to convince people that blasting a huge hole in the ground next to Kamloops is a good idea.

Melcolhed2I am in awe.

Quite some time ago, I proposed to Robert Koopmans, the communications guy for KGHM Ajax, that the company participate in a formal debate on its open-pit mine proposal.

He more or less took it under advisement.

In March last year, I editorialized that KGHM Ajax should be willing to debate the merits of its project: “When will KGHM International come out of hiding and face the public in an open debate about the merits of the Ajax project?” I asked.

A couple of weeks ago, CBC Daybreak’s Shelley Joyce asked him if the company would be willing to take part in a public debate. “You never know,” Koopmans responded.

That interested me, so I followed up with him to clarify what he meant. Is there really a chance KGHM Ajax might take part in a public debate, a debate in which a neutral moderator and formal rules of debate would give people a chance to hear pros and cons?

“I wouldn’t say no, I won’t say yes,” Koopmans said.

But it’s pretty clear he isn’t crazy about the idea. “I don’t know if it’s the best way to talk about Ajax,” he said, reverting to KGHM’s favorite “let’s have a conversation” theme.

“We’ve been having continuous conversations.”

There’s as much chance of the mining company taking part in a public debate as there is of pigs flying. There are other ways of blunting opposition.

I’ve always admired the company’s PR skills. When you’re in a business that leaves gigantic holes in the ground, you become good at it.

Today’s (Friday’s) bit of news with respect to the public review period on the environmental assessment application may be the best gambit yet. It came to light that KGHM Ajax will make another of its many community donations — but it’s the beneficiary that’s very different.

Koopmans confirmed KGHM will donate $5,000 to anti-Ajax groups that are raising money to fund a review of the enviro application. He was quoted as saying the company wants to support “responsible reviews” of its “science.”

The move puts opponents in an uncomfortable position. When I asked Kamloops Area Preservation Association spokesman John Schliermacher if the anti-Ajax groups will accept the donation, he said, “We really haven’t thought much about it.”

He said they aren’t discussing individual donations, and KGHM could have donated the money anonymously if it was serious about supporting independent reviews.

“They’re showing their true colours.” But he wouldn’t categorically rule out accepting the donation, dismissing the question as “a non-issue.”

Whether something is a non-issue, of course, isn’t always up to those who are part of the issue.

The sprinkling (more like a shower) of Ajax money among local charities — amounting to hundreds of thousands per year — has been an annoyance to anti-Ajax groups who consider it more a strategy for gaining support than sincere philanthropy.

The Stop Ajax pitch for donations on the indiegogo.com fundraising website has brought in more than $15,000 of the $25,000 goal in three days.

I’m guessing the donation from KGHM is creating some interesting behind-the-scenes discussion among the Kamloops Area Preservation Association, Kamloops Physicians for a Healthy Environment and Kamloops Moms for Clean Air, the mine’s leading opponents.

They could rationalize accepting the money by saying it’s the least KGHM could do, but there are more downsides than up. Sure, it would get them closer to the goal, but there are 27 days left in the fundraising campaign. They’d probably get there anyway.

The fundraising is a good idea, but KGHM’s counter is textbook. in fact, somebody should write a book about it after it’s all over. If the opponents take the money, they can hardly be critical of KGHM’s donations to others, or of anyone else who accepts them.

And the next time they publicly criticize the project, they’ll surely be reminded that they’re partially funded by the very company they’re in battle with.

Mel Rothenburger can be contacted at armchairmayor@gmail.com. He tweets @MelRothenburger and is on Facebook.com/mrothenburger.7.

Coup-Facebook

 

Ajax-facebook

Mel Rothenburger's avatar
About Mel Rothenburger (11714 Articles)
ArmchairMayor.ca is a forum about Kamloops and the world. It has more than one million views. Mel Rothenburger is the former Editor of The Daily News in Kamloops, B.C. (retiring in 2012), and past mayor of Kamloops (1999-2005). At ArmchairMayor.ca he is the publisher, editor, news editor, city editor, reporter, webmaster, and just about anything else you can think of. He is grateful for the contributions of several local columnists. This blog doesn't require a subscription but gratefully accepts donations to help defray costs.

8 Comments on ROTHENBURGER — The best Ajax PR coup yet

  1. Unknown's avatar Pierre Filisetti // May 23, 2015 at 7:51 PM // Reply

    The science may not be all that bad…it may meet all “agreed” guidelines monitored by… a large margin of error by an understaffed ministry.
    Will the Kamloops Great Hole Model be the the legacy our city needs…for the future?
    Will the “communication strategists” be forever around?
    Will we ever learn form past mis-steps?
    Send the money back!
    If this truly is the best PR Ajax can do…

    Like

  2. Unknown's avatar lee kenney // May 23, 2015 at 5:42 PM // Reply

    The price of awe, how venal does it get ?Based on a per capita basis how much is the cost so far , Kamloops ?

    Like

  3. Unknown's avatar John Goldsmith // May 23, 2015 at 8:35 AM // Reply

    Thanks Mel for the latest on KGHM. Hope the people who make decisions will tell KGHM/Ajax to stick it and if any funds come in from them to send it back!
    I will make a material donation to the fund (didn’t know they were in the market for financial assistance). Also signed up to support the Armchairmayor financially, about time aye.

    Like

  4. Unknown's avatar Alistair Morris // May 23, 2015 at 8:09 AM // Reply

    I don’t agree with Mel’s grudging respect of KGHM’s latest stunt. All they are doing is stirring the pot just to see what will happen. They’d have more of my respect if they ignored the anti-Ajax groups and just got on with putting on a strong public persona, but to me, this is an amateurish attempt to poke fun at anyone who opposes them.

    “It’s very difficult to argue with an intelligent opponent but it’s impossible to argue against a stupid one.”

    Like

  5. this was a good move by Ajax as now enabled the Anti Ajax movement to hire someone with a real expertise to present as opposed to the local “experts” we he from on many issues. ie smart meters, pipelines, etc

    Like

  6. Unknown's avatar Cynthia Ross Friedman // May 22, 2015 at 11:38 PM // Reply

    Hmmm…a sneaky company that plays a PR game? Um, not what I want (nor should anyone want!) for Kamloops.

    Looks like KGHM Goliath just grew an even uglier head.

    Like

  7. Unknown's avatar Sean McGuinness // May 22, 2015 at 9:39 PM // Reply

    Yes, it has great symbolic value doesn’t it. Next up, a KGHM fishing derby up at Inks Lake. Just when people thought it was dead, it’s now teeming with trout! Later there will be the invitation to the grand opening of the KGHM sponsored Goose Lake Botanical Gardens (I mean Goose Slough, sorry). Also, come and view the herds of buffalo and deer sweeping majestically across KGHM sponsored Knutsford grasslands preserve! It’s amazing what a little biosolids can do!

    Like

  8. Robert Koopmans would like to encourage responsible reviews of its “science.”
    What science are they using? Is it similar to the crystal balls err, models and percentages, that have led the Malartic mining operation in Quebec to have many notices of non-compliance issued by the Ministry of Environment because what the models had suggested has not been reality?

    Like

Leave a reply to Cynthia Ross Friedman Cancel reply