LATEST

EDITORIAL — Right to die now a political issue

EDITORIAL — Canadians suffering from untreatable medical conditions that rob them of quality of life may soon have the right to choose when they die, with a doctor’s help.

Supreme Court of Canada.

Supreme Court of Canada.

A ruling from the Supreme court of Canada on Friday says doctors should be allowed to help adults who suffer from intolerable conditions to seek help in ending their lives.

The exact effect of the ruling is unclear, and will very likely be slow to unravel, because Parliament will have a year to decide what to do: change the current law or challenge the decision.

For some, the ruling is a cause for celebration, and overdue after years of fighting for it. Everyone, they say, should have the right to have assistance in ending their own suffering.

But others fear the sanctity of life has been dealt a blow, that it opens the door to manipulation of some patients who aren’t capable of making a clear, competent decision on their own.

There are plenty of countries that have similar laws and that have safeguards that appear to work. Nevertheless, this ruling is bound to become even more of a political issue than it has been, if not immediately, then a few months from now.

None of the political parties is likely to jump into the debate with both feet until this year’s federal election is over, but as the deadline nears for compliance with the Supreme Court’s ruling, the issue will heat up dramatically.

Even after the legal nuances of the ruling are settled, the issue will as divisive as it has been for all this time before the court made its decision.

 

Mel Rothenburger's avatar
About Mel Rothenburger (11747 Articles)
ArmchairMayor.ca is a forum about Kamloops and the world. It has more than one million views. Mel Rothenburger is the former Editor of The Daily News in Kamloops, B.C. (retiring in 2012), and past mayor of Kamloops (1999-2005). At ArmchairMayor.ca he is the publisher, editor, news editor, city editor, reporter, webmaster, and just about anything else you can think of. He is grateful for the contributions of several local columnists. This blog doesn't require a subscription but gratefully accepts donations to help defray costs.

5 Comments on EDITORIAL — Right to die now a political issue

  1. Unknown's avatar Helen McLean // February 7, 2015 at 1:14 PM // Reply

    Much good debate wil be the outcome of this decision.The parameters,as I read it,quite broad.Two words come to mind “mentally competent” on the part of the person requesting assisted suicide.
    More discussion and advice on end of life care
    should be forthcoming from the physicians who have a huge part to play in all of tis.
    In our own recent personal experience, two knowledgeable and well qualified family members knew the process to put in place for a home passing-
    thereby precluding the attendance of the coroner,RCMP,fire dept. Etc.People need to be informed of this and also the palliative and hospice provided to ease a passing.All these options need to be freely available knowledge and of course may not always suitable or desirable for the person requesting release from their intractable pain.
    I look forward to hearing the debates ahead.
    …Helen McLean

    Sent from my iPhone

    >

    Like

  2. Unknown's avatar LAWRENCE BEATON // February 7, 2015 at 7:48 AM // Reply

    This is not just a political issue, it is also a moral, ethical and religious one as well.

    Like

    • Unknown's avatar Mel Rothenburger // February 7, 2015 at 9:02 AM // Reply

      Exactly, but now that the legal arguments — based on moral, ethical and religious considerations — have concluded, it is back to the political ring.

      Like

      • Unknown's avatar LAWRENCE BEATON // February 7, 2015 at 3:41 PM //

        The other three are not exactly finished yet, because if they are, we might as well pack up our bags and go home. One might also ask when was the last time a politician or political party decided anything.

        Like

    • The thing is, we all have our own ethics, morals and religions/beliefs. How about you decide what is right for you, and I will decide what is right for me?

      There is no need to legislate these tough choices as we may not share values/beliefs. Understanding individual/family and cultural differences and helping people to make the choice most consistent with THEIR beliefs and values is most ethical!

      Like

Leave a reply to Carol Cancel reply