Knox — Talking about amalgamation as hard as doing it

Jack Knox is a former city editor at The Kamloops Daily News who moved on to Victoria many years ago to write for the Time-Colonist. This week’s column, about the possible amalgamation of Greater Victoria municipalities, is reminiscent of what Greater Kamloops went through in the 1970s. When Kamloops area municipalities couldn’t work it out for themselves, the provincial government stepped in and performed a shotgun marriage. In Victoria, as Jack explains, things are different.

COLUMN — Greater Victoria politicians might want a peek at what’s happening north of the Malahat.

When residents of North Cowichan and Duncan troop to the polls this November, they’ll get to vote on whether they want an amalgamation study.

Not a vote on amalgamation itself, mind you. Just a referendum on whether they want to see an analysis of its pros and cons.

JackKnoxhedIt’s exactly the sort of question a dozen capital region municipal councils — all those except the one in the City of Victoria — have been balking at putting on the ballot here in Dysfunction-by-the-Sea. Because, you know, if you let the people engage in direct democracy, the next thing you know the womenfolk will be wanting book-learnin’ and the kids won’t fight in ’Nam.

Good grief, why are councillors so resolutely reluctant to gauge what people think?

“What are you afraid of?” John Vickers, the vice-chairman of Amalgamation Yes, asked this week as his group released an Angus Reid survey showing that:

84 per cent of capital region residents favour amalgamation
89 per cent support a non-binding referendum on amalgamation
80 per cent want an independent cost-benefit study and analysis
Only 16 per cent believe the region’s status quo is working
Those findings run smack into the claims of councillors who maintain amalgamation isn’t a priority for their constituents.

There’s only one way to settle the issue: Ask voters if they want an independent analysis of what redrawing the boundaries would mean.

Amalgamation isn’t the obvious cure some people think. While no one would design a governance system like ours — 13 independent fiefdoms and 91 councillors for what is effectively one medium-sized city — merging them would be complicated. Heaven knows how you would reconcile the pro-development policies of Langford with those of defiantly rural Metchosin, or how would you marry unionized fire departments with those relying on volunteers. Victoria has backyard garbage pickup, Saanich doesn’t and most West Shore municipalities don’t provide the service at all. And the oft-cited savings involved in reducing the number of elected officials would, relative to the overall budgets, be a drop in the bucket.

Maybe amalgamation is, in fact, a rotten idea. But that’s the point: You can’t make an informed choice without an independent analysis that identifies the benefits and drawbacks. As things stand, councils are being wilfully deaf, won’t even let residents say if they want such a study.

Politicians didn’t used to be this insulated from unwanted information. All manner of questions used to be posed to voters on election day. In 2008, Ross Crockford — best known these days as the Johnson Street Bridge watchdog — dug up a bunch of examples.

1956 — Oak Bay residents banned the sale of raw milk.
1958 — Victorians voted 2-1 in favour of amalgamation with Saanich, but Saanich residents rejected the proposal by a similar margin.
1961 — Saanich voters approved the sale of beer by the glass.
1981 — Victorians voted for Sunday shopping (some of us are still bitter about that).
Not only did we get to vote on more questions, we got to vote more often, too. Up until 1990, civic elections were held annually. Municipal councillors served two-year terms, with half the seats up for election each fall.

But then B.C. shifted to three-year terms, with everyone elected at once. This November, for the first time, we’ll go to four-year terms, meaning the next civic election — the next chance for voters to have a say in the direction of Greater Victoria — won’t be until late 2018.

Amalgamation Yes, figuring municipal councils are knowingly blocking the will of the people, wants the province to intervene, but the Liberals have steadfastly refused to wade into the capital’s interminable internecine squabbles, whether they be over sewage, policing, transportation or regional governance. (Note that last year’s provincial election left Greater Victoria without a voice at the government table for the first time since 1952.)

In short: If amalgamation doesn’t get on the ballot this time, it will be a dead issue for four years.

© Copyright Times Colonist

About Mel Rothenburger (6803 Articles) is a forum about Kamloops and the world. It has more than one million views. Mel Rothenburger is the former Editor of The Daily News in Kamloops, B.C. (retiring in 2012), and past mayor of Kamloops (1999-2005). At he is the publisher, editor, news editor, city editor, reporter, webmaster, and just about anything else you can think of. He is grateful for the contributions of several local columnists. This blog doesn't require a subscription but gratefully accepts donations to help defray costs.

1 Comment on Knox — Talking about amalgamation as hard as doing it

  1. As someone who has lived in Victoria for a dozen years from 2000 to 2011 and as someone who was personally involved as an Alderman with the first Amalgamated City Council in Kamloops, I know the solution needed in Victoria. It needs a Premier who has the foresight and fortitude to force amalgamation upon the area just like the Provincial government forced it upon the 7 cities that made up the Kamloops area. That was the best thing to happen to Kamloops in the last 50 years. I know from personal experience you need so many ears to administer a Municipal grouping of 7 cities or a City of 1. It is so much wiser, together and planned to do it as one. One of the first things we did was a comprehensive official community plan, which guided the City fir decades and permitted many things for the whole amalgamated community as one.
    Robert J Saucier BA LLB

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: