LATEST

KGHM says it’s ready to talk, so let’s have a conversation

Photo from new Ajax publication.

Photo from new Ajax publication.

FRIDAY MORNING EDITORIAL — The first release of information of any real significance from KGHM International on its Ajax project in a long time came Thursday and it’s a big one.

The company is proposing a re-drawing of its site plan to move what’s called drystack tailing storage from its original site to south of Jacko Lake and the pit. The original plan — between the Coquihalla Highway and the Lac le Jeune Road — was problematic for a number of reasons, not the least of which was aesthetic.

Under the new layout, a conventional tailings pond will stretch south from Jacko Lake through Goose Lake. It will ensure that Inks Lake is saved, but Goose Lake is a goner. According to KGHM it’s not much of a lake anyway.

What will be lost, though, is hundreds of acres of some of the prettiest ranch land around, characterized by its rolling grass meadows and groves of poplars and evergreens. Whether this is a good trade is certain to spur a whole new debate around this project — in fact, it already has.

KGHM International says it sincerely wants to consult with the public about these changes. That would be an excellent idea. Despite a pretty YouTube video that talked about the corporation’s wish to have a “conversation” with the public, there’s been little of that for quite some time. Indeed, having a “conversation” seems to be a common refrain in the mining industry — B.C. Mining Association president Karina Brino used the same words during a speech to the Kamloops Chamber of Commerce recently.

Is KGHM International ready to do that? It’s publishing another colourful brochure about the new site plan and plans three days of open houses in late June. But will it also start showing a willingness to meet with groups of concerned citizens, like the Kamloops Physicians for a Healthy Environment, Kamloops Moms for Clean Air, Kamloops Area Preservation Association, and neighbourhood and community groups — open doors, open invitations? Will it debate the pros and cons of the mine in an open forum? Will it take part in town hall meetings? Will it, in short, open a true conversation?

It has said in the past there hasn’t been much to talk about. Now there’s lots. What’s the status of its investigations into the additional ore deposits it provided as the reason last August for delaying its Environmental Assessment application? Will a wet tailings pond reduce the amount of dust that will blow into Kamloops? Where will the water come from for the tailings pond? What are the possibilities the company will want to expand the pit in future, after it’s begun operation?

So, let’s talk.

 

Mel Rothenburger's avatar
About Mel Rothenburger (11607 Articles)
ArmchairMayor.ca is a forum about Kamloops and the world. It has more than one million views. Mel Rothenburger is the former Editor of The Daily News in Kamloops, B.C. (retiring in 2012), and past mayor of Kamloops (1999-2005). At ArmchairMayor.ca he is the publisher, editor, news editor, city editor, reporter, webmaster, and just about anything else you can think of. He is grateful for the contributions of several local columnists. This blog doesn't require a subscription but gratefully accepts donations to help defray costs.

7 Comments on KGHM says it’s ready to talk, so let’s have a conversation

  1. Unknown's avatar Jason strate // May 30, 2014 at 11:53 PM // Reply

    Looks to me like Mel was feeling a little left out as cfjc, NL and CBC all got to hear about this the day before the arm chair mayor…

    Like

    • Unknown's avatar Mel Rothenburger // May 30, 2014 at 11:58 PM // Reply

      The news release was made to some media ahead of time on an embargoed basis, that is, they had to promise not to publish until 6:30 a.m. Also, interviews were scheduled with different media at different times, instead of holding a press conference.

      Like

  2. Well said, Sean! It is time for politicians to get off the fence and state their positions on Ajax. My one question to all candidates in this coming municipal election is: Are you for it or against it? And I will cast my ballot accordingly. As for Mr. Lake, our “Health” minister, his silence on the potential devastating effects to the well being of this community, should this mine be built, is shocking and abhorrent.

    Like

  3. KGHM is trading us a photograph in exchange for the REAL.
    Remember Joni Mitchell’s words, “They paved paradise. And put up a parking lot.”

    Like

  4. Unknown's avatar Sean McGuinness // May 30, 2014 at 9:31 AM // Reply

    I never bought into the whole ‘conversation’ thing. As far as opponents of the project are concerned, it’s like gathering two hockey teams at center ice to discuss how one team can win the game. If anyone, we should be talking with the referee, i.e. the gov’t. Anyway, dialogue with KGHM is futile, unless you want to ask them the questions they want to answer. At the same time, I’m fed up with hearing the standard “waiting for the environmental assessment” response from our politicians. I mean, c’mon. Somebody wants to dig a giant crater next to your city and destroy a lot of land in the process, and you’re waiting for people to assess a bunch of numbers? Where’s our sense of value?

    Like

    • Right on, Sean.
      Peter Milobar, Pat Wallace, et al have trumpeted that “wait for the environmental assessment” bull crap – justifying it further by saying “the city has no say in the decision”. If council had “no say” when the project was within city limits, how will they ever defend city interests when the project is entirely outside city boundaries.

      Well, it looks like Milobar has been snookered by KGHM. We desperately need some new blood on council – people with courage to speak up for Kamloops residents wherever and whenever their health and environment is put at risk.

      Like

Leave a reply to Shelly Cancel reply