Cutting size of council would save money, talk
THE ARMCHAIR MAYOR (COLUMN) — What if there were only six Kamloops City councillors instead of eight?
There’s nothing stopping it.
The Community Charter, the legislation governing City councils in B.C., sets the number of councillors at eight for cities with more than 50,000 people. Smaller communities have six or four councillors.
But councils are allowed to have fewer than the mandated number if they want. All they have to do is adopt a resolution saying so at least six months before the next election.
That means council could vote any time within the next two and a half months to reduce the number of councillors that would be elected in November to six for the following term. The Charter is a bit fuzzy on when a referendum is needed but council could always put it to a vote come election time.
There are benefits. Council voted itself a pay raise that takes effect after the next election. Terms in office were increased from three to four years by the provincial government this week — one stated reason was to save money.
Assuming council doesn’t give itself more raises during the next term, their salaries will total a little over $1.1 million.
Reducing the number of councillors to six would save about $193,000.
But, of course, the incumbents would no doubt insist there’s too much work for only six. Yet at least two B.C. councils are looking seriously at cutting themselves down to size.
Alberni City council will consider a motion March 10 to reduce itself from six to four councillors plus mayor after this year’s election, and the District of Lanztville is also looking at slimming down from six councillors to four.
The rationale is that, aside from money, fewer councillors would improve workflow and increase engagement.
“Just because it’s been a mayor and six councillors for all this time doesn’t mean that it has to stay this way,” Alberni councillor Rob Cole was quoted as saying in the Alberni Valley News a couple of days ago.
If you think politicians talk too much, well, fewer councillors should logically equal less total talking.
If you’re now thinking we should consider going even further and cutting the council in half, let’s not throw the baby out with the bath water. Keeping it at six would protect the City’s proportional representation on the Thompson-Nicola Regional District.
A little streamlining might be just the thing to up the production level at City Hall and save some money too.
AROUND THE TOWN — MP Cathy McLeod spoke in the House this week on National Anti-Bullying Week, saying that “distributing images of a person against his or her will should be a crime” and supporting the government’s online crime bill… Don’t forget the upcoming talk by Dr. Peter Tsigaris on economics and air quality, 2 p.m., March 9, TRU Clocktower…. Just as importantly, don’t forget that’s the same day we return to Daylight Savings Time… Kamloops Arts Council is exhibiting selected works from its Art Exposed event until March 22 in its 7 West Seymour St. gallery.
armchairmayor@gmail.com
With eight there is a greater chance someone will actually listen.
With six, there is less of a chance.
However, if we could find six outstanding Councillors then perhaps six would be enough. What is the chance that will happen?
LikeLike
The issue for me is more of council understanding its role versus the role of administration. Reducing the size of council does little to improve public oversight of municipal affairs (which is the core role of a city council).
If council members are tinkering with daily operations then six council members can be too many. At the same time, if council members are fulfilling their proper roles by representing the public interest in the administration of this city, setting strategic direction and establishing budget priorities, there is more than enough things to do for an 8 person council.
LikeLike
Interesting idea. For what it’s worth, had we had a six-member council in the 2011 vote, the two at the end of the ballot would have been Nelly Dever and Donovan Cavers.
Click to access 11-results.pdf
LikeLike