LATEST

EDITORIAL – Do Kamloops City councillors deserve a raise in their pay?

(Image: Mel Rothenburger file photo)

An editorial by Mel Rothenburger.

A BIZARRE RECOMMENDATION in Henry Braun’s report on Kamloops City council’s dysfunctionality this week was that City councillors deserve a raise.

Bizarre because it simply doesn’t fit in with the purpose of his assignment, which was to provide guidance to a council in trouble. As I mentioned after the report was released, Braun suggests councillors give themselves and the deputy mayor pay increases.

His actual wording is this: “Review Council Remuneration Bylaw — Examine the Remuneration Bylaw for adjustments due to increased workload for Councillors and the Deputy Mayor payable retroactively from the workload’s starting point.”

What is he talking about? What workload starting point? What increased workload? He doesn’t say. Since there’s no mention of the mayor’s workload, it’s logical that the idea of giving the councillors raises came through his conversations with them.

There’s nothing to suggest current councillors have experienced more workload than past councillors. His conclusion that they need more money is based on nothing.

Maybe he was persuaded by his own experience — as mayor of Abbotsford, he and his councillors were paid quite a bit more than their Kamloops counterparts. In 2022, the last year Braun was mayor, he received $128,098 compared to Kamloops mayor Ken Christian, who got $103,040. Abbotsford councillors were paid $47,879; Kamloops councillors $41,216.

Lower Mainland municipalities in general pay their mayors and councillors more than those in the Interior but there’s no compelling reason for the latter’s pay to match the former. There’s no shortage, though, of examples in which municipal politicians have given themselves handsome increases.

But to the real point — how would giving councillors a pay raise help with the dysfunction at City Hall? A reward for not being able to get along? At the same time as he recommends a raise for councillors, Braun proposes that the council insert monetary penalties into its code of conduct for members who misbehave.

“Code of Conduct Amendments – With legal input, amend the Code of Conduct to include sanctions for repeated offences, with a structured remuneration penalty. For example: first infraction, 10% reduction in salary, second infraction 25%, third infraction 50%, fourth infraction, 75% reduction.”

He did verbally note that such a clause would have to apply to all members of council, but the subject of his report overall is the mayor.

So, have councillors done such a fine job, and are working so hard, that they should be paid more, retroactively? You be the judge but councillors seem to like Braun’s recommendations, and talk in terms of adopting all of them, so be ready to pay them more.

Mel Rothenburger is a regular contributor to CFJC Today, publishes the ArmchairMayor.ca opinion website, and is a recipient of the Jack Webster Foundation Lifetime Achievement Award. He has served as mayor of Kamloops, school board chair and TNRD director, and is a retired daily newspaper editor.  He can be reached at mrothenburger@armchairmayor.ca.

About Mel Rothenburger (10414 Articles)
ArmchairMayor.ca is a forum about Kamloops and the world. It has more than one million views. Mel Rothenburger is the former Editor of The Daily News in Kamloops, B.C. (retiring in 2012), and past mayor of Kamloops (1999-2005). At ArmchairMayor.ca he is the publisher, editor, news editor, city editor, reporter, webmaster, and just about anything else you can think of. He is grateful for the contributions of several local columnists. This blog doesn't require a subscription but gratefully accepts donations to help defray costs.

6 Comments on EDITORIAL – Do Kamloops City councillors deserve a raise in their pay?

  1. Ryan JV Ellis // May 9, 2024 at 10:39 AM // Reply

    If they want more money, do more work.

    Most people are wising up to the fact that it’s Trawin and McCorkell pulling all the puppet strings, and their job is primarily to handle the workload that would’ve been the responsibility of FULL-TIME Councilors in any other city.

    If Kamloops made the Councilor positions full-time, doing full-time work, and removing certain senior staff members, then more accountability will be placed on the Council, upping the stakes for them to actually listen to their constituents than worrying about what non-elected people are feeling.

    Like

  2. I wonder if there is a double meaning from Coun. Mike O’Reilly or maybe have I taken it out of context with out getting the full story. Just like the Braun report.

    “As Coun. Mike O’Reilly tellingly commented, the report is “exactly what I was looking for.” A RAISE IN PAY.( my words)

    Cooper

    Like

  3. Eight faultless ones to get raises?

    Would there be any benefit whatsoever from involving a different proctologist for a second opinion?

    Liked by 1 person

  4. Continuum // May 9, 2024 at 8:11 AM // Reply

    In Braun’s runup for mayor of Abbotsford Braun ran on a platform of “fiscal responsibility” and “better accountability” in local government when “his son was director of development planning for the city”  did he fire hid son for lack of accountability?

    Former Abbotsford Mayor Bruce Banman that Braun defeated by 600 votes to become Mayor of Abbotsford states that Mr. Braun was known for his lone opposing votes calling him “(not) a team player”. Mr. Braun accuses the Mayor Reid Hamer-Jackson (RHJ) as not being a team player “with others in city hall, and exhibits “contempt for authority structures.” Braun’s and the 8 councillors’ teamism  “you are with us or against us” got us into this mess.

     Mr. RHJ for years saw the vandalism, police, ambulances, fire trucks in the area from First Avenue to Overlander Bridge blocking traffic. Many of us saw this, so did the city administration and so did the 8 councillors who in their election platform they saw it as a priority for cleanup, which was also a priority of the voting public, but once elected, the 8 ignored it and turned their guns on RHJ with accusations which were often confessions or excuses for breaking the trust that the voters placed on them.

    The city descending into homelessness, crime and businesses fleeing and RHJ wanted to do something about it. The demise of Kamloops did not start with RHJ, as former mayors Mel, Terry, and Peter saw this as well but they used their tenure to climb up the political pyramid trying to please everyone where they had some success. What did the 8 in opposition do? They installed more tents, nicely coloured banners, facades, to hide our shame for not prioritizing healthcare in our communities.

     The problem is not so much to know who is right in this situation but to question the way our City Council makes their decisions on all kinds of issues. Let’s forget about what happened in the past, but let’s try to examine the roots of the present conflict. Braun’s report should have been an overall evaluation of the management of the city rather than RHJ having a target on his back.  

    Braun’s report is not an analysis of the management of the city, but allegations against RHJ based solely on his intersection with the 8 councillors and their allies who have a vested interest in its outcome and the “pay hike for the Councillors and the Deputy Mayor payable retroactively” which is the chocolate icing on the “Gateau Russe” for the ones who are demanding sanctions and mayor’s resignation based on an evaluation by Mr. Braun’s belief it’s always sunny in Abbotsford but we know its not.

    Liked by 1 person

  5. Bill Thot // May 9, 2024 at 7:05 AM // Reply

    First off, why was a raise even a topic of discussion in this report? Did Byron McCorkle get to Mr. Braun?

    There is no way in hell this council deserves a raise. A raise is earned by way of strong performance. There has been none of that – only performance theatre a.k.a. a council sideshow!!

    Give yourselves a raise?!?!? That’s some punchline!

    Like

Leave a comment