LATEST

EDITORIAL – Code of Conduct has been a major waste of time and money

Provincially appointed advisor Henry Braun delivers his report to City council in May 2024, in which he recommended sanctions to change behaviour. (Image: File photo, Mel Rothenburger.)

An editorial by Mel Rothenburger.

CITY COUNCIL DYSFUNCTION is costing Kamloops taxpayers a lot of money.

A summary to the end of 2025, published by the City, shows that Code of Conduct complaints filed by council members against one another continue to rack up tens of thousands of dollars in expense. The question arises, is the new Code of Conduct regime worth it?

In the old days, Codes of Conduct for municipal councils were somewhat toothless things, the only real punishment available against violators being a motion of censure. In essence, it was a finger-wagging “don’t ever do that again” sort of exercise.

With Codes of Conduct now mandatory, and especially with the acrimony between the current crop of councillors and the mayor, a variety of serious sanctions has come into play. Those found guilty of breaking the code of behaviour may now have their pay dramatically cut, be ordered to take re-education courses, ordered to issue apologies, be barred from certain meetings, be removed from committees or even — such as the case with Mayor Reid Hamer-Jackson — be booted from being an official spokesperson for the City.

First, though, they have to be found guilty via a formal investigation, and that costs dough. In fact, the bill now tallies several hundred thousand bucks since the current council took office. It would be even higher if not for council’s decision in August 2023 to exclude the public from filing Code complaints and restricting the system to council members who get mad at each other.

By the time they were eliminated, public complaints had cost almost $130,000 in fees to the lawyers who investigated them. And not one was substantiated.

As well, a lot of complaints by council members against each other have been “summarily dismissed.” Those ones typically cost a few thousand each.

Nine complaints have been withdrawn. The most expensive of those was one for close to $22,000.

A couple of complaints are still in progress. One has cost $30,952.20 so far, the other $45,125.98. According to my trusty calculator and me, the grand total since the updated Code came into effect in May 2023 comes to more than $460,000.

Some complaints have, as mentioned, come from the public. Others were filed against the mayor by councillors. Still others were filed against councillors by the mayor. Only a few of the 28 complaints have been substantiated. Most of the consequences have been to the mayor. Coun. Bill Sarai got a slap on the wrist for Tapegate. A complaint by Coun. Katie Neustaeter against the mayor was dismissed.

Again, has the beefed up Code of Conduct been worth it? Nothing has changed since it came in. Other than from Sarai, there have been no apologies. There have been few other consequences of note other than the mayor’s pay cuts, the closing of his office and his removal as City spokesperson. But nobody’s behaviour has been altered. Council meetings are still a gong show. They’re all still at each other’s throats.

Indeed, other than laser focusing the public’s attention on the dysfunction, there has been zero net benefit. The Code has simply been weaponized. It has been a waste of energy and money.

Mel Rothenburger is a former regular contributor to CFJC-TV and CBC radio, publishes the ArmchairMayor.ca opinion website, and is a recipient of the Jack Webster Foundation Lifetime Achievement Award, and a Webster Foundation Commentator of the Year finalist. He has served as mayor of Kamloops, school board chair and TNRD director, and is a retired daily newspaper editor.  He can be reached at mrothenburger@armchairmayor.ca.

Mel Rothenburger's avatar
About Mel Rothenburger (11597 Articles)
ArmchairMayor.ca is a forum about Kamloops and the world. It has more than one million views. Mel Rothenburger is the former Editor of The Daily News in Kamloops, B.C. (retiring in 2012), and past mayor of Kamloops (1999-2005). At ArmchairMayor.ca he is the publisher, editor, news editor, city editor, reporter, webmaster, and just about anything else you can think of. He is grateful for the contributions of several local columnists. This blog doesn't require a subscription but gratefully accepts donations to help defray costs.

3 Comments on EDITORIAL – Code of Conduct has been a major waste of time and money

  1. Unknown's avatar Pierre Filisetti // January 7, 2026 at 8:40 AM // Reply

    As a matter of curiosity I would like to know how many millions of dollars the City forgoes annually in municipal tax revenue because of the revitalization tax exemption scheme and who really benefits from this scheme in the end.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Unknown's avatar John Noakes // January 7, 2026 at 7:09 AM // Reply

    Mel, your editorial touched a lot of people.  The Code of Conduct exercise has been a waste of time, money and human resources.

    A journalist/city editor has given most of her exposure to Code of Conduct coverage in a way that belittles the elected Mayor and pokes fun at the personal loss he has suffered.  Is there enough depth in that type of “journalism” to include as part of one’s resume?

    Mel, your “Frootloops” spoof can’t be ignored for its value in revealing truth using satire at its best.  The visit to City Hall by Santa on December 23rd was also satirical. It delivered a pointed message through the gifts Santa brought in his sack. It also reminded us of our loss of democracy through the shoddy treatment he received. The climax was the sight of tears in his eyes as he pronounced “you folks have it all but you really have nothing”.

    Has the Code of Conduct exercise revealed exactly that?

    Like

  3. Unknown's avatar garrywdavies // January 6, 2026 at 5:24 PM // Reply

    This article exemplifies what is wrong with Kamloops civic governance. Its distortion and deflection only reinforce the destructive culture created by one of the most secretive and bullying city councils and administrations in recent memory. The result has been a steady erosion of public trust.

    The code of conduct castigates Mayor Hamer-Jackson for attempting to lift the veil of secrecy surrounding City Hall. In doing so, it ignores a critical reality: some councillors have chosen to weaponize the Code of Conduct (COC) by filing unsubstantiated and frivolous complaints.

    According to the City’s own website under “Council Conduct and Investigations,” there are 29 COC matters listed. Of these:

    6 were deemed “substantiated” in the opinion of a lawyer not by a court of law

    10 complaints were dismissed as frivolous

    9 complaints were withdrawn

    Of the substantiated findings, four involved the Mayor and two involved Councillor Sarai. Importantly, these were legal opinions, not judicial rulings. The Mayor was found to be in technical breach for releasing information from in-camera meetings and for conflict-of-interest matters. Councillor Sarai was found to have misled the public by lying and to have allegedly releasing confidential documents.

    The cost to taxpayers for these substantiated findings alone was $252,093.25, an unacceptable expense simply to referee internal disputes between elected officials.

    But it gets worse. This is where the weaponization becomes obvious.

    Legal fees totalled $90,420.57 for nine unsubstantiated complaints and $44,553.58 for ten withdrawn complaints. That is $134,924.15 spent on complaints that ultimately went nowhere.

    In total, hundreds of thousands of taxpayer dollars have been burned resolving disputes that should never have reached this level of disputes that could have been settled by a kindergarten class.

    City Council needs to move past personal grievances, internal power struggles, and the refusal by some councillors to accept the authority of a duly elected mayor. And while disagreements are part of politics, dishonesty is not. I will have a very hard time forgiving the act of lying by Councillor Sarai.

    This is not governance. It is game playing at public expense and Kamloops residents deserve far better.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a comment