JOHNSON – Will Kamloops City council fix its boondoggle ways?

The 6th Avenue monstrosity. (Image: David Johnson)
NOTE: This is part one of a two-part column on City council boondoggles.
CALLED IT last summer, but I didn’t use the word ‘boondoggle’ … should’ve.
Talking about the bike lane on 6th downtown.
Back then, I discussed just how much this bike lane is NOT used, after $2.2 million (of which $1.5 million was federal funding) was dumped into it … because ‘if you build it, they will come’ … or it seems thought Council.
Aaand … come they didn’t.
This past February, discussions from some around the horseshoe left the feeling that they have finally woken up to the real world … albeit two years too late.
Someone on staff charged with the task of watching bike lanes looking for a body count, report that it gets 100-150 users on an average good weather day.
Ya … I’m gonna call them out on that as BS.
If we napkin up this math and divide the average of that by 12 hours of daylight … that should be thereabouts 10 users per hour, every day.
I guarantee you that is not happening, by factors.
I spend a good part of my day passing by there and my better half spends office hours overlooking this bike lane. She is lucky to see a couple users per day.
We have been told by people who live with a view of 6th Avenue, that they don’t see much evening or weekend use either. This monstrosity gets more use by the half dozen mobility scooters in town than commuting or fitness conscious bike riders.
It’s as if someone at the City is taking the busiest weekend summer community festival day usage of this bike lane, and just copying/pasting it to every other day.
And no, the excuses of it ‘not being well connected north or south to other bike infrastructure’ … just isn’t an argument. At one end, we have the bike lane connecting to the path heading up Pederson Creek, which is pretty much a one way for all but the most seasoned Tour de France racer in training, and at the other end is literally a railroad track, even if you can ride to the Blue Bridge or into Valleyview from there.
Anyone on or off Council that thinks more money poured into extending this project to include more bike infrastructure to feed it, thinking it will put new people on bikes at such a significant amount to justify it … is either deft of logic and reason, a Council politician trying to secure future votes from a tiny base, or is emotionally trapped in the ‘let’s be fit and green kum-ba-yah’ crowd.
There will never be the idealized 500 users per day … ever … or at least not before Kamloops population numbers triple.
Boondoggle is a very kindly way to define this whole mess. A mess based on bad forecasting and potentially misleading math.
But what do we do now?
We can spend Timmies coffee time and columns whining about it, or just roll our eyes, accept that we are here, and start fixing it.
So, let’s do that.
First, and we’re talking this week; reprogram the traffic lights back to vehicle centric use, cover all the special bike timing traffic lights, and have the few bike lane users respect the traffic reds at intersections, and use a delayed left turn vehicle traffic lights to get the bikes and pedestrians across safely.
You know … how every other intersection works.
Then eventually, a year or so on, look at ripping out the concrete and the expensive bike lane lighting (storing it for a future use), and just make that lane … a bike lane determined by paint … or better yet, just move the bike lane entirely to 5th Avenue, like bikers wanted in the first place.
Do this, though, just seal up and leave the underground wiring and services installed down there alone. Never know, one day a future Council with no knowledge of this attempt, might want to put in a bike lane.
Let’s save my granddaughters’ future property taxes a bit.
So where are we:
1 – it’s fine for Council members to today recognize that a previous Council did this badly, but they also need to today, talk about a plan to get out of it.
2 – The next time Council want to consider, let’s say … a bike lane somewhere, instead of pouring concrete and going full on permanent on day one, set it up temporarily with orange pylons and paint on the blacktop for a year, and see what the usage will looked like, then move on to the bigger job if it’s justified.
If they did this for 6th Avenue, I guarantee we would not be there today.
We can expect Council to pull off the occasional boondoggle. What’s more important is how they learn from it, and adjust processes going forward, before massive amounts of money are spent … again.
I donno … like a pedestrian bridge over McGill,
… but that’s another boondoggle story, for another day.
David Johnson is a Kamloops resident, community volunteer and self described maven of all things Canadian.
Speaking of cyclists and breaking laws? What needs mentioning is the frequent use of sidewalks by cyclists. This happens all over Kamloops even in in areas that have a dedicated bike lane (i.e. Valleyview Drive). I drive there almost daily and see this dreadful practice. The cyclist swerving to miss pedestrians is extremely dangerous!
LikeLike
Adam, you’re being argumentative, bike paths by nature are for slow traffic, no one is racing along at 32kmp and that’s not to mention the non legal e-bikes. Clearly we’re in a revolution of e-bike users and society at large have not caught up to develop new rules of the road. It’s inevitable that our next discussion will be speed limits on bike paths.
LikeLike
Yes Virginia, there is a insanity clause and some boondoggles are more costly than others, the outdoor skating rink at 7 + million comes to mind ! My daze on the Bicycle Advisory Committee convinced me, they don’t listen ! In Velo Veritas !
LikeLiked by 2 people
Why waste taxpayer money on useless expensive infrastructure, to only end up talking about ripping it up a few years later? You all should be fired for this. The city needs proper pathways, but instead this is what you come up with?
Unprecedented levels of moronic capability on display at city hall. You could say it’s a kind of moron mill.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It is good to have dedicated cycling paths but for sure the CoK can’t deliver them without much controversy. But it would be quite a crazy thing to mothball it.
Perhaps what could make cycling paths more popular would be to adopt/develop a more comprehensive cycling culture.
LikeLike
The City just spent $3.4 million to add an extra turning lane onto Pacific Way. I believe the City is paying for all of that and some of it through long term debt. That is only one of a great many vehicle centred projects this year. So, yes your grand daughter is going to inherit debt but bike lanes aren’t going to be much of it.
There are issues with the 6th Avenue bike lane in that it can be argued that it is overbuilt. However, it isn’t an issue of not needing a bike lane, rather it really is an issue of connectivity which was much too casually dismissed by the Mr. Johnson. We could argue 6th vs 5th Avenue forever, but really the problem is the bike path ending at Lansdowne. Council decided to not approve a bike lane on Lansdowne, noting it would remove a few centimetres of width from the vehicle lanes, so here we find ourselves. A road to nowhere until additional Active Transportation infrastructure is built out. That may happen when the Performing Arts Centre is built so don’t damage our options before that by spending a lot of money to remove the lane.
Cycling in Kamloops became a much more viable option for many with the rise of the eBike. It essentially flattens the city so the trail in Peterson Creek (Xget’tem Trail) isn’t just one way or limited to Tour de France cyclists. However, most people considering riding a bike, need to be separated from traffic to feel safe. It doesn’t help that cars are on average a foot wider than they were in 2013 and the F150 is longer that a World War 2 Sherman or Panzer tank. It doesn’t help that the average SUV driver can’t see a child in front of their car in a parking lot. It doesn’t help that the maximum legal speed limit isn’t even the minimum socially acceptable speed. Hence the need for separated bike lanes, and, YES, build a connected system and it will be used.
Regarding the quip about cyclists running red lights. The scale of this issue is a true urban myth, especially compared to drivers. Multiple studies have shown the cyclists break fewer laws than drivers and I am not aware of a study suggesting the opposite. One large study using cameras at intersections showed about 5% of cyclists breaking laws when on bike paths and 14% when not on bike paths. However, an earlier study showed that 66% of drivers were found to be breaking laws. The myth comes from bad driving behaviour being normalized and thus not noticed while bad behaviour from ‘others’ stands out.
Finally, we often say we want a ‘family friendly’ city. Don’t separated bike lanes move in that direction? Wouldn’t it be nice for a family to be able to cycle to City events or even for kids to cycle to school? Is that so bad?
LikeLike
E-bikes are making dedicated cycling paths very dangerous.
LikeLike
Considering this town doesn’t have any dedicated cycling paths outside of 6th Ave., what exactly are you basing that statement on?
LikeLike
should’ve added because they can and do reach speeds incompatible with the very nature and mandate of a dedicated cycling pathway.
LikeLike
Legal e-bikes don’t get assisted past 32 km/h – how is that incompatible with… cycling?
LikeLike