EDITORIAL – What Mark Carney must do to defeat Pierre Poilievre
An editorial by Mel Rothenburger.
MARK CARNEY’s cute video with comedian Mike Meyers is just the sort of thing the new prime minister will have to do more of if he’s to beat Pierre Poilievre and the Conservatives on April 28.
Carney made it official today — we’re going to the polls and the date is April 28. The Liberals enter the election, believe it or not, ahead of the Tories in the public opinion surveys. Their comeback since the resignation of Justin Trudeau is already legendary. Whether it will carry through to election day remains to be seen.
Although we don’t vote directly for our prime ministers, party leaders are the Number One consideration of Canadians at the ballot box. So, the choice will be Carney or Poilievre. Certainly, there will be many issues surrounding that choice, the main one being who can do the best job against Donald Trump.
But how we relate to the two leaders as people will be the big thing. And they’re polar opposites. Poilievre is a political pitbull, effective with trite slogans and one liners that have captured the attention of Canadians for the past couple of years in a highly effective way.
But people have grown tired of that approach, and his “Axe the Tax” brand of rhetoric has been dealt a serious blow by Carney’s promise to remove the tax from consumers. That leaves Poilievre with the rather weak response that we can’t trust Carney to keep his promise.
At any rate, Poilievre, though not necessarily in a likable way, is a polished speaker. He’ll very probably out-perform Carney in debates. Carney isn’t a strong public speaker and he has less than an ounce of charisma. He reminds us, alarmingly, of the egghead Michael Ignatieff, who took over as Liberal leader with great hopes and soon crashed and burned in 2011 due largely to his unrelatable countenance.
“Most crucially,” a National Post columnist wrote after Ignatieff had left the scene, “he lacked the political skills to persuade Canadians he was one of them.”
What Carney has going for him, though, is that he’s personable and engaging in one-on-one situations. He has a sense of humour that doesn’t often emerge when he’s at the podium. Watch the recent interview he did with Jon Stewart, for example, and compare it with one or two of his speeches.
If Mark Carney the regular guy can be show cased on top of his obvious intellectual genius and impressive achievements, he can carry the momentum against the sarcasm of lifelong politician Poilievre.
That’s why the little video skit that Carney issued yesterday of himself and Meyers, in which Carney tests Meyers on his Canada knowledge, is so smart. If you haven’t seen it, Carney runs into Meyers at the rink, both of them wearing hockey jerseys.
Carney, pointing out that Meyers lives in the U.S., fires a few test questions at the defensive Meyers, who insists he’ll always be a Canadian. Carney throws a few queries at him about Mr. Dressup, the Tragically Hip, Stompin’ Tom Connors and other Canuck icons, with the capper being, “You’re a defenceman, defending a two on one. What do you do?”
Meyers nails the answer with, “Take away the pass, obviously.” But now it’s Meyers’ turn for a question: “Will there always be a Canada?” And Carney responds reassuringly, “There will always be a Canada.”
Then they wrap up with an “elbows up” salute.
Besides being funny, the whole thing is a subtle acknowledgement of the Canada vs. U.S. debate currently dominating the news. And it shows off Carney as a human being. With more of that, he’ll be a formidable opponent.
Mel Rothenburger is a former regular contributor to CFJC-TV and CBC radio, publishes the ArmchairMayor.ca opinion website, and is a recipient of the Jack Webster Foundation Lifetime Achievement Award, and a Webster Foundation Commentator of the Year finalist. He has served as mayor of Kamloops, school board chair and TNRD director, and is a retired daily newspaper editor. He can be reached at mrothenburger@armchairmayor.ca.
It should never be forgotten that the Torys have caused businesses to flee Canada. Our aerospace industry was killed by them.The first free trade deal was foisted on us by them caused a lot of manufacturing to go to the US and then oversees.Mulroney is still controlling them from the great beyond. It takes business accumen to rebuild a made in Canada policy. Polievre has no clue.
LikeLike
Elections aren’t won on cameo comedy; they’re won on policy, trust, and execution. Prioritizing a viral video over, say, a coherent economic plan or a rebuttal to Poilievre’s attacks feels like a misplaced bet.
Sure, U.S. relations matter, trade, borders, all that, but the idea that Canadians are picking their PM based on who’d stare down Trump in some imaginary showdown is laughable. It’s a red herring, pulling focus from actual domestic concerns like cost of living, housing, or health care. If the Liberals are banking on that as their pitch, they’re misreading the room.
Trust is a huge factor in politics, and if Poilievre can sell that Carney’s a flip-flopper, it’s not trivial. Dismissing it outright smells like wishful thinking. Plus, calling Poilievre’s style “tired” ignores how effective it’s been at cutting through the noise, people don’t ditch a winning playbook that fast.
Carney’s portrayal is where the foolishness really creeps in. He’s “not a strong public speaker,” has “less than an ounce of charisma,” and reminds people of Michael Ignatieff, a guy who flamed out because Canadians couldn’t relate to him just as they can’t relate to Jagmeet who sold out the NDP to get the Liberals to pass Childcare and Dental care. Mel admits Carney’s weaknesses, then pivots to this fantasy where his “obvious intellectual genius” and a quirky video will carry the day. It’s delusional—voters don’t care about your resume if you can’t connect.
Personality gimmicks while glossing over substance is not a winner. Carney’s tax promise gets a passing mention, it should be explained and understood, the tax is needed. Carbon externality costs to our society are huge but there’s no meat on what these costs are and how they work or why it does not resonate with voters. Poilievre is not Trump he will have an edge in debates, “showcasing” Carney’s charm is a strategy built on vibes, not results. In a head-to-head where one guy’s a seasoned brawler and the other’s an untested egghead, a comedy skit isn’t the trump card, it’s a sideshow. The let down is thinking Canadians are that easily dazzled. I hope they are in this case. The Democrats bet on dementia and you know the results.
LikeLike
Mark is not a career politician nor a lawyer…that’s great. Now he has to show he is not following the footsteps of Trudeau’s “social policies”. And if he could commit in defunding the CBC that would be awesome!
LikeLike
Good God, he has less than an ounce of of charisma compared to PP!!!
LikeLike