EDITORIAL – Pettiness continues around the City council horseshoe

(Image: Mel Rothenburger)
An editorial by Mel Rothenburger.
THE PETTINESS around the Kamloops City council horseshoe knows, it seems, no bounds. When the council meets today (March 4, 2025) for its regular meeting, Mayor Reid Hamer-Jackson’s report will be the last thing on the agenda before adjournment.
That’s because, during adoption of the minutes at the last meeting, Coun. Katie Neustaeter moved that the mayor’s report be moved to the bottom of meeting agendas for the next 607 days.
If you’re handy with a calculator, you’ll have figured out that 607 days is roughly the amount of time until the next civic election in October 2026.
The motion was seconded and Neustaeter provided no explanation for her motion. Neither were there any questions or debate from the other councillors. Hamer-Jackson asked, “Has it been discussed with council prior to this meeting?”
There was no answer. He asked twice more. Neustaeter finally replied that part of councillors’ job is “to communicate amongst each other” and to “build agreement.” Which was no answer at all.
“So the answer is yes,” said Hamer-Jackson.
The mayor was likely making the point that if councils get together in any form, over dinner, in an online chat or otherwise, and there’s a quorum present, such a gathering constitutes an official meeting and requires that minutes be kept.
This rule is to avoid council members skirting the restrictions around in-camera meetings by getting together unofficially for beers or wherever in order to avoid discussing something in public like they’re supposed to.
So what’s the point of moving the mayor’s report down the agenda? Hamer-Jackson has been a thorn in the side of councillors with his mayor’s reports, trying to use them to publicly litigate his various grievances over investigations that have been done into his conduct. To a point, it’s OK to do that if it relates to council business but he does overdo it, and it bugs the hell out of councillors.
Since anyone can remember, the mayor’s report has been in the middle of the agenda, between notices of motion and public inquiries, and just ahead of councillors’ reports. Today, Hamer-Jackson’s report follows those of councillors, just before adjournment. Being relegated to a spot below the rest of council adds insult to injury.
This will make it much easier for councillors and staff to walk out if they don’t like what he’s saying, without interrupting the meeting. I’m sure councillors, if they were to explain themselves (but they won’t, preferring to remain silent), would say it’s for procedural efficiency, but it sure looks like just another shot at the mayor.
Speaking of Neustaeter, a column she wrote for Castanet is going over like crap cakes with a lot of folks on social media. The column, headlined “New facilities will help make Kamloops a can’t-miss destination” is a defence of the alternative approval process used to get borrowing authority for a new performing arts centre and ice rink.
It begins by describing a trip the councillor and her “banker husband” took to Kelowna for a concert. The point was that Kelowna gets entertainment events Kamloops doesn’t because Kelowna has better facilities.
But her references to those who opposed either the arts centre or ice rink, or the approval process, are what has raised hackles. She write about a conversation with “someone who has vocally opposed any healthy growth in Kamloops,” and about “negative voices” and people who are “angry with life and visionless for our city.”
Such tone-deaf comments are exactly what I was writing about a week or so ago in regard to Coun. Kelly Hall’s remarks after the City’s use of the AAP was validated in court. Councillors really must stop the put-downs of anyone who disagrees with how they’re doing things.
After all, they represent all city residents, whatever their viewpoints.
Mel Rothenburger is a former regular contributor to CFJC-TV and CBC radio, publishes the ArmchairMayor.ca opinion website, and is a recipient of the Jack Webster Foundation Lifetime Achievement Award, and a Webster Foundation Commentator of the Year finalist. He has served as mayor of Kamloops, school board chair and TNRD director, and is a retired daily newspaper editor. He can be reached at mrothenburger@armchairmayor.ca.
I was under the impression that council members are supposed to consider the views of all residents, not just those who agree with them.
Neustaeter’s cliche-ridden letter and mean-spirited motion aside, councillors should at least second the mayor’s motions so that they can be openly discussed in council.
By not doing so, the councillors are essentially shutting down a large portion of their constituency who voted for the mayor and his ideas.
I wish the big spenders around the horseshoe would let go of their partisan politics–it’s hurting the city they are supposed to be helping.
LikeLike
What a petty group of city councillors we are stuck with for the next 593 days (my countdown from the initial 607 days) until the next election. The BS just doesn’t stop!
Thanks, Mel, for including reactions to Ms Neustaeter’s Castanet column. When I read it, I would have liked to respond, but Castanet did not open her column for comments. I don’t go down the rabbit hole of social media but I’m not surprised that others were less than impressed.
I was so happy that Katie and hubby could enjoy the band of their youth, and devastated that they had to travel the vast distance to Kelowna to see them. What a sacrifice they made. NOT! A band cannot stop in every city across Canada, they chose to go to Kelowna rather than Kamloops. The Kelowna concert was held in Prospera Place – a hockey arena with seating capacity of about 7800 for concerts. Sandman Centre has somewhere around 6000-6400 seating capacity. Looking at their tour site, it appears that all concerts on their tour are in hockey arenas. No surprise there. Apparently they chose Prospera instead of Sandman. The proposed PAC will have a main stage theatre capacity of either 1100 or 1200 seating, depending on where you look. Do you really think that a rock band will trade the revenue from the sale of several thousand additional tickets for the privilege of performing in a glass walled building?! Not likely! Katie, your assertion that “We need artists like those of our youth to know that Kamloops isn’t just a place you pass through, it’s a place that you can’t miss” falls apart. The PAC will not attract rock bands – there’s no correlation between the two.
Like others, I’m tired of hearing how the AAP not only met but exceeded the requirements. Yes, it met the letter of the bylaw, but only enough to ensure their desired result. The rules for an AAP are flawed anyway. Only 30% of eligible voters turned out for the Kamloops 2022 civic election, yet 10% of eligible voters are required in an AAP?! The 5802 nays for the PAC is 25% of those who bothered voting in the civic election. A referendum should be compulsory for borrowing for wants as opposed to needs. It is the ethical choice that a responsible council should have made. Then both the vehemently in-favour and the vehemently-opposed have to show up and be heard and those who don’t care one way or another simply live with the results.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Borrowing a few more 100 million should bring up the question about which of the 3 biggies to cut out seeing as the roads all have to be upgraded to service these 30 year edifices. The road to the remand centre is adequate now but will need a lot of tax dollars to handle the rink traffic. We have already coughed up downtown for the highrise so logic says, Red Bridge, RCMP, PAC. No money for the rink at its present location.
LikeLike
Typical. “BULLIES’ IN GOVERNMENT IS NEVER ACCEPTABLE”
So sad that there are those that believe that their way is the only way. And with this belief, ‘in their mind’. The current results we in Kamloops experience, is ignored.
What about our roads. Terrible. They ignored the condition of the ‘Red Bridge’ till someone ‘fixed’ the problem once and for all. Roads are a safety issue.
And what about the homeless. The mayor wants to work on this issue. But the bullies’ ignore the subject. And what about the minutes of their meetings that never materialize.
And unfortunately, this is now in the USA.
Good luck to all.
Gary Warman
LikeLike
As the Armchair Mayor has suggested, this is simply one more way of shaming the Mayor in a most public fashion.
Thanks to the Armchair Mayor for pointing us to read Katie’s latest homily (public explanation of a sacred doctrine). Indeed, maybe we will get our heads out of the sand; the weeds. May she hope that senior citizens who vote in the next election will have forgotten her condescendence by then.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I have to agree that the Katie and her banker husband article was completely tone deaf. But this is a common theme from council. Council continues to do the most to ensure they’re the most despised council in a generation. You would think that the sheer volume of vitriol directed toward them would help them get a clue, but it seems they prefer to double down time after time.
Still no word about repercussions for Lyin’ Bill. Continued digs at the Mayor however.
Aside from the rude digs at the taxpayers paying their salaries and the bill for their pet projects, this council hasn’t realized that bands and shows are not going to make the trip from Kelowna to Kamloops on their way to Vancouver.
Council makes decisions on hopes and dreams instead of common sense. This council is condemning Kamloops taxpayers to a long long tax bill, and it will be mostly for naught.
Council is trying to polish a turd. Kamloops will always be a turd so long as we’re the crime capital of Canada.
The PAC will not:
Attract doctors to the crime capital of Canada.
Solve the geographical location of Kamloops and attract bands on their way to/from Vancouver.
Another council boondoggle.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Via Google I did find the op-piece. The thing is no banker would ever lend money for a PAC not for ice sheets unless a hefty profit is to be had. But unlike the CoK the private sector truly does not have the luxury to comeback to its participants constantly asking for more money to keep the doors of the facilities open. For example I am certain that the fees generated by the Tournament Capital Center are paltry compared to its building/maintenance costs
And to be clear, Kelowna is a better run city with a lot of beautiful trees, much nicer shopping and a way, way better food scene. And they have better cycling too.
LikeLike
I open Castanet every day and I have yet to encounter a column by Neaustater. Where do I find it?
LikeLike
Hard to find. Opinion tab, Opinion sub category, scroll down a couple of columns.
LikeLike