JOHNSON – Reacting to Trump’s 51st-state talk plays right into his hands

IT’S BEEN FUN to sit back and watch the back and forth between President-elect trump and PM Trudeau around Canada being the 51st American state and associated jabbing.
Since winning the presidential election in November, Trump has increasingly taunted Trudeau, often referring to him as a governor, equivalent to a state-level American leader on his social media platform, Truth Social.
“Their (Canada) Taxes would be cut by more than 60%, their businesses would immediately double in size, and they would be militarily protected like no other Country anywhere in the World,” Trump wrote in his Christmas Day post.
So, just what is going on here? What exactly is Trump trying to do with all of this?
Let’s look beyond the surface level rhetorical jabs and remind ourselves that this is how Trump plays what he thinks is 4D chess … and that’s not to say it’s complex or even a mildly complicated political approach.
At the end of the day, it’s all just a power play, pre NAFTA negotiations.
But for us, let’s just look at it one step at a time.
First, NAFTA 3 discussions are around the corner. Trump’s America is going to want some serious concessions from Canada (dairy and softwood for quick examples of a long list), and there’s a good chance we might see a fundamental shift from the trade ideologies of the three-country NAFTA to a CAN/US bilateral agreement anyway. Trump knows that as of late December, we are a long way off of actually talking about a deal, but he is definitely in the right time window to begin curating the negotiating space.
Step one to that? In Trump’s mind it means denigrating his upcoming opposition, so he looks and feels in control of the situation. So, he uses the long-time trope of Canada joining the U.S.
He’s not even original.
Second, it doesn’t make the slightest difference to him, which person and or which Canadian political party sits on the other side of the negotiation table. It’s helpful for Trump to have Trudeau around right now in the situation he is in domestically … being pretty much an ostracized lame duck … as hurling insults at Trudeau doesn’t mean anything in the long term as he won’t be around anyway.
This makes today … prime sandbox/ play time for someone like him. Enter the bully intending on making other children cry and run away.
Trump’s approach entering into a big deal like this is to first set the other side up as evil and basically in the wrong, in this case by throwing out insane numbers of how much ‘Canada has taken advantage of the U.S.’ … and attaches large and unrealistic, reinterpreted dollar amounts to the suggestion.
Then he throws out a ludicrous benchmark long before he even takes office, to put the opponent on the back foot – in this case a 25-per cent tariff on all things Canadian – then starts the long-haul conversation denigrating the other party heading for the table – saying Canada has no value if it isn’t actually American.
And boom … he sets off panicked tongues in Canada.
He believes that having a disheveled and reactionary tense opponent in negotiations is the preferred prep work … rather than a team-based discussion between equals or a negotiation of ideals.
Picking up on the old ‘Canada as 51st State’ rhetoric is a good one as it pokes at Canada, gets everyone riled up, and means nothing … and most importantly is far off topic from trade negotiations. His entire goal here is to absorb the news cycle, and get everyone in Canada in the argument of defending itself … when they don’t need to.
Then when he does arrive at the table, he feels big.
The bully is flinging sand around the playground, and calling out the kid with glasses.
This is a false flag game.
Trudeau for the most part hasn’t responded to it … which may end up being the adult approach. Don’t get caught up in the blow by blow, and stay above the fray. By doing this, you just don’t give it air. There is no point to anyone getting into a shouting match with a toddler, even a 78-year-old one trying to bend messaging, before important negotiations.
Just don’t play along, and focus on setting your own agenda.
Senior Liberals have sought to downplay the comments or frame them as well-intentioned jokes. Canada’s ambassador to America, Kirsten Hillman, characterized Trump’s social media posts as ribbing between two close countries. Foreign Affairs Minister Melanie Joly said in early December that she had joked with Republican senators, offering them to join Canada as the 11th province.
Opposition leaders and pundits around Canada have been caught up by Trump’s gamesmanship, and has run with the ball he gave them, doing exactly what he wants by changing the conversation in the country. What they don’t realize is that by doing this, they are not actually serving Canada’s interests … even if they do manage to satiate their base voters need for daily programming.
It was only this week that Trudeau posted a twitter link to that viral 2010 Olympics video where Tom Brokaw explains Canada to Americans; a surface level description that is clear to define Canada as a sovereign nation … the tweet simply titled ‘Some information about Canada to Americans’.
Trudeau just left that there, a quiet mic drop to be sure.
This tweet came just hours after former Bank of Canada governor Mark Carney publicly denounced Trump, saying the incoming American president’s remarks about “Governor Justin Trudeau” were “carrying the ‘joke’ too far.”
“The casual disrespect, the poor tax math, and ignoring that workers on both sides of our border will be better off if we work together”.
Carleton University professor Aaron Ettinger, who studies Canada-U.S. relations, said Canadian officials have rightly been dismissing the social media posts and maintained a ‘focus like a laser beam’ on the real and ‘existential threat’ of tariffs.
Trump’s silliness over the state of Canada’s sovereignty … strikes me as being profoundly unserious. These are taunts, churlish provocations that are not mature, and do not reflect just how serious the coming trade war is. Trump is likely continually posting about Canada because it plays well to his supporters, without being seen as a real threat of annexation.
The one thing that must make Trump happy is Chrystia Freeland’s resignation. Remember she summarily handed his administration a serious dousing in the last NAFTA talks, where she pretty much put a simple ‘no’ to all the point-by-point rhetoric he wanted in the deal. At the same time, she and her team got senators and governors who benefit from U.S./Canada trade, to badger the White House.
Trump basically got nowhere.
This time Trump is trying to parlay the argument with complete reinterpretations and fabrications. Let’s look at the comment at the top of this column: him saying that if Canada joins the U.S.:
– “Canada taxes would be cut by more than 60 per cent”
(maybe corporate taxes, but not individual taxes – Americans pay far, far more),
– “businesses would double in size”
A comment that means nothing; which businesses? what kind of businesses? and how much of this is because of the coming deregulation of businesses in many industries to U.S. SOP’s … a practice we in Canada prefer?
– “militarily protected like no other country in the world”
A thing that three really big oceans and a hair-trigger neighbour already has covered. We’re good.
Notice how he doesn’t mention joining the ‘so successful’ American healthcare system?
In other words … there’s nothing in any of this,
which reverts what this is, from sandbox bluster.
Canada needs to just shut up and stop giving him strength by reacting to every single blurt he comes up with. Getting caught up in it just feeds him and allows him to direct the conversation the way he wants it to be seen.
If we don’t control our own narrative, we have already lost the upcoming negotiations.
We … the federal governments and parties, as well as provincial outspoken leaders like Doug Ford and Danielle Smith need to stop telling Trump what we will do to counter the tariffs, this far ahead. It just gives them a chance to plan for the electrical power drop threatened towards some states that buy power from Ontario, for example.
Why prepare them months ahead to your actions? Millions of homes and businesses suddenly going dark the moment the tariffs hit, will work against Trump immediately. You telling him your gonna do it two months before …
Why would anyone tell any negotiation table how it is going to react, months before they even sit down?
What an idiotic approach.
Doug Ford … just shut up and be ready to hit the switch.
David Johnson is a Kamloops resident, community volunteer and self described maven of all things Canadian.
As it is inscribed on the Blaine Peace Arch when Canada was very much a British colony, ” Children of a common Mother”
LikeLike
Soo … simply submitting to a trumpian / American takeover because we dont like our present Canadian PM and government … wait … what?
Thats the kneejerk thought, without even considering the reality that present Canadian leaders and governments come and go … as they always have, but thats ok … only today matters and Trudeau is doing such a poor job we should just capitulate and fold up our Constitution and Bill of Rights and be absorbed into the ‘merican way?
Thats the kind of single minded, temporary, tunnel visioned thinking that elected trump again, made Hitler think he should turn Europe into his arian vision, or even consider that Poilievre is actually going to be a better PM … before he even gets there.
You had an interesting debate, until unravelling it entirely in the second half.
LikeLike
Rayn when one salutes Nazis in Parliament rather than educate society about Nazism and what it represents and how they came to Canada, what Trump is talking about will happen from the inside rather than by invasion from the outside. There are hundreds of examples of this where domestic quislings influence those who don’t like to read that Nazis were “freedom fighters” .
LikeLike
Forget about all of this back and forth there is nothing free in a “free market” and government as we know it. Trump and Justin are just tools in a bigger game called government for the few, run by the few which serves the few. The game is called laws for the few and when government refuses to regulate them or regulates them with fines that are a slap on the wrist, they tell us they are in a battle between capitalism and socialism which is the root of all evil. They won’t tell you that we already have socialism – for the very rich while the working people of Canada are subject to realities of harsh capitalism. Trump ‘s comments a re just a diversion from this harsh reality.
LikeLike
Great comments, David. I just wish someone would tell Pepe le Piew to “shut up” and quite trying to be Canada’s Trump. He acts like him and makes weird statements like him. Time to grow up, Pepe. If you want to be Prime Minister, act like on.
As far as the press goes, it seems that they can’t think for themselves and want to keep any “goofy” story in the headlines as long as possible. Ignore them, please.
Keep up the good work, David.
LikeLike
The big question is what President elect Musk will come up with vis a vis automobiles and parts. If the big 3 shut down due to Elons power grab tariffs,
Musk wins. We lose. The sales of Tesla automobiles should be tariffed if Musks spokesperson slaps tariffs on the big 3. What’s the diff between an American tariff and a Communist Chinese tariff. From the sound of it Chinese cars are as good or better than a Tesla trump wagon.
LikeLike
The idea of US annexing Canada has been a interesting ink-blot test for sure. Putting criticism of Trudeau and Trump aside. The bigger question being asked is, “Are you proud enough as a Canadian to allow such a thing to happen?”, “How to do see yourself as a citizen of this country, when there could be an option to keep Canada as is or sell it to the highest bidder, or even allow another country to take over?”….
This country is divided, anyone saying differently are most likely the one’s doing the dividing through their own arrogance in believing imposing policy that is an affront to most people’s freedoms, is somehow done in the name of preserving the Canadian identity… which is what exactly?…
See opinion pieces like this give me a chuckle because it’s written in a voice that clearly thinks there is one absolute identity to conform to, and that’s whatever Trudeau has done for this country, or that if the option was to side with the Americans or keep Canada as is under a continued rule of Trudeau… somehow Trudeau is still the better option to take, because above all it’s more important to maintain that Canadian identity (warts and all), than join with America.
So am I proud of being a Canadian? Well, not since the 90s when the pinnacle of Canadian pride was simply “not being American”. When the one thing above all was what we were most proud of, like free healthcare was readily available; now it’s a 6 hour wait to even be seen, and somehow MAiD is becoming a option these days… Due to recent failure in policy and scandal after scandal produced by our current PM, (which has never happened under any other PM in history, fyi). AND THEN being told to “take it”… whether it’s taxes on top of taxes, or compelled speech laws, or “get out of jail free” cards for the criminally insane, and now it’s breaking immigration policy and burdening our infrastructure to the point no born Canadian is properly being looked after… where is this identity I’m supposed to preserve?… It’ll get to the point we should let Trump have his way with us, and perhaps get treated marginally better, because Trudeau and his ilk certainly won’t.
I’m being told to “Stop feeding into Trump-hysteria” Maybe that’s not the answer. How about stop feeding into Trudeau’s failures? Failures that made this country weak economically and culturally, all the while still being told to have pride in this country that’s done nothing but screw us over.
I doubt annexing Canada is a real thing, other than a glib joke in the back of Trump’s mind. It’ll never happen for real…. but if you showed me the possibility and asked what I see…
LikeLike