LATEST

EDITORIAL – We’re right where we should be on a new cancer centre

(Image: Mel Rothenburger)

An editorial by Mel Rothenburger.

NOW WE’RE GETTING SOMEWHERE with the cancer centre. Doesn’t seem like it, but we’re right where we should be.

Last week’s provincial budget has local politicians hopping mad because it didn’t include mention of the cancer centre. The excuse given by the government is that it missed a printing deadline.

That sounds pretty lame. Opposition finance critic Peter Milobar has been hammering the government for it, saying he worries the government will stall until after the fall election, after which all bets are off.

Although Finance Minister Katrine Conroy says the centre will be included in a first quarter capital project update, Milobar says that update won’t come until very shortly before the election because the first quarter doesn’t actually start until April 1.

MLA Todd Stone calls the missed printing deadline “total crap.”

They aren’t the only ones unhappy with the centre not showing up in the budget. Thompson Regional Hospital District Chair Mike O’Reilly calls it “totally unacceptable.”

Maybe it really was a printing problem, maybe it was incompetence. Either way, Milobar, Stone and O’Reilly are doing their jobs; keeping the government’s feet to the fire is how things get done, not with a website and an expensive, invisible lobbying campaign paid for by local taxpayers.

Our MLAs, especially, have a couple of direct and very public lines to the government. One is called Question Period. Another is the budget debate. Milobar has wasted no time bringing up the absence of the cancer centre in the budget, lambasting the government at great length during debate.

The government, which has no aversion to deficit spending, is insisting work on the new cancer centre will start in 2025. The fact this is an election year can work to our advantage — substantive evidence will have to be shown that the centre is on track, especially if the NDP hopes to do well here in the October election.

I’m Mel Rothenburger, the Armchair Mayor.

Mel Rothenburger is a regular contributor to CFJC Today, publishes the ArmchairMayor.ca opinion website, and is a recipient of the Jack Webster Foundation Lifetime Achievement Award. He has served as mayor of Kamloops, school board chair and TNRD director, and is a retired daily newspaper editor.  He can be reached at mrothenburger@armchairmayor.ca.

Mel Rothenburger's avatar
About Mel Rothenburger (11605 Articles)
ArmchairMayor.ca is a forum about Kamloops and the world. It has more than one million views. Mel Rothenburger is the former Editor of The Daily News in Kamloops, B.C. (retiring in 2012), and past mayor of Kamloops (1999-2005). At ArmchairMayor.ca he is the publisher, editor, news editor, city editor, reporter, webmaster, and just about anything else you can think of. He is grateful for the contributions of several local columnists. This blog doesn't require a subscription but gratefully accepts donations to help defray costs.

1 Comment on EDITORIAL – We’re right where we should be on a new cancer centre

  1. An editorial by Mel Rothenburger. Tells us that now “WE’RE GETTING SOMEWHERE with the cancer centre.” He calls the recent announcement “pretty lame” while opposition finance critic Peter Milobar has been hammering at it in the legislature. Mr. Stone calls it “total crap” and Thompson Regional Hospital District Chair Mike O’Reilly calls it “totally unacceptable”  

    Why do nine out of ten Canadians think that our country and its government is a force for good in the world in domestic and foreign policy. We have a media bias that is in tune with political partisanships rather than understanding of the many problems that we face. We have a media problem, healthcare problem, education problem, homelessness problem, crime problem, infrastructure problem, immigration problem, racism problem and too many more to mention.

    Gentlemen with all due respect to all four of you do you really UNDERSTAND the problems in healthcare. There are no short-term fixes that are going to magically make this all better. It would have happened by now if decision makers in the past understood the problem or if political representatives did not treat the issue as a bridge to the next election.  It would be foolish for me to say I have a guaranteed solution, but I don’t see an understanding of this issue by calling it lame, crap, unacceptable and then hammering on it in the legislature without providing verifiable and measurable outcomes.

    Governments decision makers at every level need to strategically prioritize to confront the existing health inequalities nationally provincially and locally. We need to look at examples and ask why Singapore is the best healthcare provider in the world for 2024 and learn from them. It’s called priorities. 

    What are our priorities; a performing arts centre or a medical school at TRU, three billion for war in Ukraine to kill people or more medical schools to train doctors to save lives. Priorities driven by money and profit and political upmanship rather than by a collective need and working toghether mask what is really the problem with how we provide healthcare.

    Like

Leave a comment