LATEST

EDITORIAL – N. Thompson landowners can’t fight river threat by themselves

Mayor Reid Hamer-Jackson at site of riverbank slide. (Image: Mel Rothenburger)

An editorial by Mel Rothenburger.

I WENT FOR A LOOK at some North Thompson River properties with the mayor and some members of the media yesterday and what we saw was shocking.

One property off Dairy Road has lost a massive amount of land — several acres worth — to the river in a recent slide. The owner says it happened virtually overnight. And it’s not over yet — huge rifts in the ground are a signal that more land will erode into the ever-changing river.

Another property, just north of the intake for the Noble Creek Irrigation System, is also losing a long swath of bank. And it’s obvious that once the temporary riprapping at the intake is removed, the river is going to cut through the point and claim even more.

Mayor Reid Hamer-Jackson wants something done to stop it. He knows that proper riprapping along such a huge stretch of river is beyond the resources of the City and he’s trying to get the federal and provincial governments involved. He’s also consulting with Tk’emlúps te Secwe̓pemc.

His view is that riverside landowners are taxpayers like everyone else and deserve help, and he’s right. When things get to the point they’re at with the examples we saw yesterday, it’s simply not possible for the owners to protect themselves — their very homes are at risk.

Traditionally, the attitude of senior governments has been that property owners whose land is threatened by river erosion are on their own. Even trying to get permission to riprap at your own cost is tough.

But things have changed. Climate change, clear cutting of forests, and dramatic changes caused by forest fires have changed runoff patterns and the way rivers act.

Rescuing just the properties we saw yesterday could cost millions. Add to that all the other properties fighting off erosion in the province and we’re talking billions. But, as the mayor says, the losses will be much higher if preventive measures aren’t taken.

I’m Mel Rothenburger, the Armchair Mayor.

Mel Rothenburger is a regular contributor to CFJC Today, publishes the ArmchairMayor.ca opinion website, and is a recipient of the Jack Webster Foundation Lifetime Achievement Award. He has served as mayor of Kamloops, school board chair and TNRD director, and is a retired daily newspaper editor.  He can be reached at mrothenburger@armchairmayor.ca.

Mel Rothenburger's avatar
About Mel Rothenburger (11564 Articles)
ArmchairMayor.ca is a forum about Kamloops and the world. It has more than one million views. Mel Rothenburger is the former Editor of The Daily News in Kamloops, B.C. (retiring in 2012), and past mayor of Kamloops (1999-2005). At ArmchairMayor.ca he is the publisher, editor, news editor, city editor, reporter, webmaster, and just about anything else you can think of. He is grateful for the contributions of several local columnists. This blog doesn't require a subscription but gratefully accepts donations to help defray costs.

5 Comments on EDITORIAL – N. Thompson landowners can’t fight river threat by themselves

  1. Reid is the type of person who would advocate for a citizen in this predicament. He is morally right in doing this.
    I hope I’m wrong on this one but I can’t help but feel the plot is being formulated to discredit him for doing this. Will there be a statement issued by “others” which represents the ” “true and official stance” “?

    Like

  2. We live in such a fractious time with little trust, it’s hard to know who to believe. Why is the province and feds so quiet on this issue, it involves both of them as well. So I ask, why is the mayor the only one on council or administration who is fighting for this issue, why aren’t our MLA’s, MP and the rest of council pushing the feds & province to speak up?

    Like

  3. The city should never have allowed the property immediately to the north of the intake to be developed or even sold. It’s what used to be called “no man’s land” b/c it is flooded almost every year. I have seen that property many feet underwater at spring freshet for years before development and after. Now the taxpayer is likely on the hook for another bad city hall decision.

    Like

  4. Unknown's avatar Dave monsees // November 28, 2023 at 7:28 AM // Reply

    So, where were all the Councilors in regard to this issue? Was it only the Mayor that took time to visit this problem? Did they all stay away so they could take shots at the Mayor for investigating this problem on the river. They have been talking about this problem for weeks.

    Like

  5. Wouldn’t that be a huge expense to protect a few properties with a minute overall benefit?

    Like

Leave a comment