LATEST

EDITORIAL – Pronouns and the eternal debate over parents’ vs. kids’ rights

(Image: CFJC today)

An editorial by Mel Rothenburger.

PARENTAL RIGHTS are always controversial and they’re really up for debate right now. It revolves around whether students should be able to change their gender pronouns and what, if any, role parents should have in it.

Saskatchewan and New Brunswick have adopted new policies for schools, requiring parental consent for students wanting to change their preferred pronouns.

In Canada, by law, parents have the right to make all decisions necessary for their children’s well-being, such as health care and where they live, where they’re schooled and matters of religion.

But kids have rights, too. They have a right to be protected. Advocates say they have autonomy over their bodies, including how they identify.

On the other hand, those who favour strong parental rights insist parents should have much more control over what children are taught, including what books they’re allowed to read. There’s always talk of the “erosion” of parents’ rights.

Another nuance is the matter of what age a child’s rights begin, which troubles parents, teachers and the courts alike.

On the specific topic of pronouns, a recent study by the Angus Reid Institute found that most of those surveyed believed schools should inform parents if children wish to change their pronouns, but were divided on whether parents should actually have the final say over whether kids are allowed to do it.

The true culprit is the lack of a gender-neutral pronoun in the English language, which has bothered linguists for generations. The ultimate answer might be to invent one, since the increasingly common use of “they” in place of “him” or “her” is awkward for many people. One U.S. jurisdiction has even proposed the use of “y’all” to replace current gender pronouns.

Until the day we find one and use it to refer to everyone no matter their sexual identity, the debate will continue, as will the attempt to find balance between parents’ rights and the rights of our kids.

I’m Mel Rothenburger, the Armchair Mayor.

Mel Rothenburger is a regular contributor to CFJC Today, publishes the ArmchairMayor.ca opinion website, and is a recipient of the Jack Webster Foundation Lifetime Achievement Award. He has served as mayor of Kamloops, school board chair and TNRD director, and is a retired daily newspaper editor. He can be reached at mrothenburger@armchairmayor.ca.

Mel Rothenburger's avatar
About Mel Rothenburger (11601 Articles)
ArmchairMayor.ca is a forum about Kamloops and the world. It has more than one million views. Mel Rothenburger is the former Editor of The Daily News in Kamloops, B.C. (retiring in 2012), and past mayor of Kamloops (1999-2005). At ArmchairMayor.ca he is the publisher, editor, news editor, city editor, reporter, webmaster, and just about anything else you can think of. He is grateful for the contributions of several local columnists. This blog doesn't require a subscription but gratefully accepts donations to help defray costs.

3 Comments on EDITORIAL – Pronouns and the eternal debate over parents’ vs. kids’ rights

  1. I’m with Mr. Rothenburger, “they” just doesn’t cut it., but Sweden and Norway have gotten it right:

    “Hen (Swedish: [ˈhɛnː]) is a gender-neutral personal pronoun in Swedish intended as an alternative to the gender-specific hon (“she”) and han (“he”). It can be used when the gender of a person is not known or when it is not desirable to specify them as either a “she” or “he”.”

    Introducing new English words is nothing new. According to the Global Language Monitor there are 1,019,729 words in the English language. And growing each year to the tune of 650+ new ones. There is no reason why a gender-neutral pronoun can’t be found. All it will take is for someone or group to start using a word as a pronoun and let it gain traction. Happens all the time.

    Just having an accepted pronoun will help make things easier for everyone.

    Like

  2. Unknown's avatar Ken McClelland // September 19, 2023 at 6:19 AM // Reply

    Perhaps if kids were not being subjected to SOGI programs, encouraged to question sexual identity and stuff like drag queen story time when they’re in kindergarten, we wouldn’t need to be having this debate at all. Let the kids be kids and leave them alone as regards sexual development. That comes soon enough anyway. Grooming 5 year olds smacks of pedophilia and needs to stop. It is little wonder we have a generation of angst-ridden and confused kids. If I had young kids today, I would seriously question putting them in public school at all. Our schools with their young captive audiences are not the place for implementation of activist agendas.

    Like

Leave a comment