LATEST

BEPPLE – New bylaw will push more drug use into hidden, unsafe places

Scene from Kímmapiiyipitssini- The Meaning of Empathy.

Rather than creating bylaws targeting open drug use, it’s time to find ways to expand harm reduction for smoking and inhalation which is where the majority of deaths are occurring

I ATTENDED the International Overdose Awareness Day events in Kamloops this week hosted by Moms Stop the Harm and Tk̓emlúps te Secwépemc. There, along with information booths, and naloxone training, a film was shown.

The theatre was full of families and friends who had lost loved ones, as well as service providers who have seen so many die in Kamloops.

The film, Kímmapiiyipitssini: The Meaning of Empathy by filmmaker Elle-Máijá Tailfeathers traces the effects of substance use on her Kainai First Nation in southern Alberta, as well as the community’s response to the substance use and overdose deaths.

The title of the film comes from the nation’s approach, where kindness is central.

The film shows how the community has taken a balanced approach. Individuals who want to take an abstinence approach are supported through programs such as residential recovery programs, or Alcoholics Anonymous and Narcotics Anonymous.

However, there is an acknowledgement that not every person can follow that path. In that case, there are options such as methadone and suboxone for people with opioid addictions, or regulated alcohol programs for people using alcohol or products such as mouthwash or hand sanitizer.

Harm reduction is central to the Kainai First Nation approach.

Kamloops is in an unregulated, toxic drug overdose crisis. This year, until the end of July, there have been 33 drug overdose deaths in Kamloops from unregulated drugs. Since 2017, there have been 442 deaths in our community. In the B.C. Interior, in 79 per cent of deaths fentanyl was detected. The death rate is 74.9 per 100,000 in Kamloops for 2023, far above the provincial average of 46.2.

The vast majority of deaths take place in private places. In the B.C. Interior, 60 per cent die in private residences. Another 14 per cent die in other types of residences. There are 4 per cent who die in other inside places. The majority are dying by smoking (2 out of 3), with far fewer dying by injecting drugs.

Only 14 per cent die outside.

People use drugs in Kamloops in inside places. And die in inside places.

While I was watching the film, which followed the paths to stability for many and death for some, I kept thinking back to the proposed bylaw that is currently being crafted for Kamloops.

Proposed by Coun. Katie Neustaeter few months ago, the bylaw could ban drug use in public spaces in Kamloops. The bylaw is in response to the Province’s decriminalization of possession of small quantities of illegal drugs for personal use. Neustaeter’s concern was that allowing possession of drugs allows for open drug use throughout the city. The goal is to curb street disorder and give the City tools to address open drug use.

The bylaw is not yet passed, but given the support from fellow councillors so far, it looks like it will.

Street disorder is a problem in Kamloops. Needles in playgrounds is a concern in Kamloops. But people dying alone, at twice the provincial rates which are already six times higher than when the opioid crisis started, is an absolute tragedy.

They are dying, for the most part, out of sight in private places. They are dying primarily by smoking or inhaling their drugs.

Currently Interior Health only provides safe injection harm reduction services. Last month in the B.C. Interior, 60 per cent died by smoking, and 29 per cent died by nasal insufflation/snorting, whereas only nine per cent died by injection drug use.

I am drawn to the approach of the Kainai First Nation, which centers their approach first on harm reduction, and then options of recovery such as abstinence. I see nothing of that in a bylaw that’s focus is reducing the number of people openly using drugs on our streets. It will push more drug use into hidden, unsafe places.

Rather than creating bylaws targeting open drug use, it’s time to find ways to expand harm reduction for smoking and inhalation which is where the majority of deaths are occurring.

Finally, I was impressed with the open and frank messaging the Kainai First Nation has about the harms of drugs, and the services available. The film showed billboards and posters throughout their nation.

It’s time for the City of Kamloops to be more blunt with its messages to help protect the people who use unregulated toxic drugs in our community too. We owe it to all the families and friends of the 442 individuals who have died in Kamloops since 2017.

Thanks to Moms Stop the Harm and Tk̓emlúps te Secwépemc for bringing our community together.

Nancy Bepple is a Kamloops City councillor with a strong interest in community building projects.

Mel Rothenburger's avatar
About Mel Rothenburger (11594 Articles)
ArmchairMayor.ca is a forum about Kamloops and the world. It has more than one million views. Mel Rothenburger is the former Editor of The Daily News in Kamloops, B.C. (retiring in 2012), and past mayor of Kamloops (1999-2005). At ArmchairMayor.ca he is the publisher, editor, news editor, city editor, reporter, webmaster, and just about anything else you can think of. He is grateful for the contributions of several local columnists. This blog doesn't require a subscription but gratefully accepts donations to help defray costs.

22 Comments on BEPPLE – New bylaw will push more drug use into hidden, unsafe places

  1. I would like to highlight the ridiculous hypocrisy on display by Interior Health, a proponent of decriminalization and so called “safe” supply.

    Recently in Vernon, a community discussion occurred over how to dispose of drugs should you come across them. Interior Health stated the following:

    “To safely dispose of drugs, we suggest picking up the substance with gloved hands, placing it in another plastic bag/container that can be sealed and then taking it to the RCMP for disposal, followed with thorough hand washing with soap and water right after,” an IH spokesperson said in an email.
    “It is not appropriate to flush drugs due to impacts on the water system.”

    If it is not appropriate to put drugs into the water system, how is it appropriate to put them into human veins? If it is so dangerous to touch, that it’s recommended to wear gloves when doing so, how is it OK to inject or inhale it?

    If these dolts were teaching a math class, the lesson would be 2+2 = 5.

    Like

  2. I hope Coun. Bepple understands that by publicizing her opposition to Neustaeter’s bylaw motion, she will not be allowed to vote on the actual motion should it come to Council.

    Like

  3. Unknown's avatar Bronwen Scott // September 4, 2023 at 9:58 AM // Reply

    The Indigenous “safe supply” approach includes lots of cultural aspects and supports to help addicted people find additional strength in community.

    Bepple seems to think free substance delivery would work on its own without all the important Indigenous aspects of the Kainai First Nation approach.

    She really should have attended the Solutions Forum in June, where community building was a strong focus for successful long-term recovery. But of course she boycotted it with the rest of the Gang of Eight.

    Like

    • She wasn’t there at the community forum, wasn’t she?
      I also wonder if she knows anything about the third panelist dropping out at the last minute.
      Then there is the track record on all other matters pertinent to the broader community that need a bit of scrutiny. What we know is she is fully supportive of the senior administrators.

      Like

      • Pierre, you’re still at it, attacking individuals and adding nothing to the conversation. Maybe you would like to share with us one your “…ample solutions …”.

        Personally, I could care less if Ms. Bepple (or anyone else) is supportive of the “senior administrators”, “engaged in narcissistic writing” or is a vegetarian. What I want to hear are proposals to address the problems on the street. Your post adds nothing to the conversation!

        Like

      • Lead by example Bob.
        You tell us your solution and leave me alone.

        Like

  4. Sound like the Bepple finally found a good cause to put her boundless energy towards…or is this just another piece of narcissistic writing?

    Like

    • C’mon Pierre, you’ve got to be kidding. Ms. Bepple attends on her own nickel the Kamloops International Overdose Awareness Day event. She comes away from the evening and shares her observations. She includes the path the Kainai First Nation is following to tackle their OWN drug crisis. The Kainai First Nation in a three-month period have had 42 out of 62 deaths from drug overdose related, drug-related, or suicides.

      How on earth is Ms. Bepple’s piece “narcissistic writing”. Pierre, you might serve our community better by being less critical of others and applying some critical thought to the real problems facing Kamloops.

      Like

      • You have really no idea of what I do for this community nor the ample solutions provided to various councils and administration over the years about issues you don’t even know. So don’t be critical of me calling out the barrage of yes narcissistic writing from Bepple. Her posturing on council (including her previous stint) and the criticism of the current mayor is utterly annoying. As they say Mr. Gamble you are entitled to your opinions but facts are a different matter.

        Like

      • Coun. Bepple is displaying what is known as “narcissistic compassion” in circles that aren’t drinking the progressive Kool Aid.

        Narcissistic compassion is like the good intentions fallacy. It arises when someone’s compassion may make another person’s situation worse, but they’re unwilling to reflect and consider that possibility because they think that only their intent matters, and they feel good. It does often involve virtue signalling and self inflation.

        Like

  5. Further to my earlier comment, we just walked Riverside Park. Where is the Bylaw Control? There are many large encampments all along the River, with more moving in as we were walking. Shopping Carts everywhere, even one from Home Depot. Are they coming from up the hill? What a mess to our beautiful Parks.

    Like

    • Technically the river banks up to the high water mark are crown land and the city has no legal authority. It seems to me the city is encouraging homeless to set up camps on the river banks as a way of avoiding the issue of actually helping with this population. By not setting up an area for this population to gather/sleep/live where no-one feels comfortable including the homeless. The flawed proposed bylaw, besides being completely unenforceable, prescribes to take areas away from this population but doesn’t provide access to new areas for them.

      Like

  6. You can pass all the Bylaws you want, who is going to enforce them. Bylaw Officers with the new title Community Services can’t stop smoking, drinking, dogs in Parks with bylaws against that.
    Don’t complain to Mayor Jackson because that will only cause another expense investigation against him for reviewing other complaints against Community services.

    Like

  7. Coun. Bepple appears unable to see that benevolence for drug addicts can be achieved while maintaining order and safety for the community at large. Helping addicts does not have to include the destruction of the community and public spaces at the same time.

    Anyone that suggests an addicted individual be provided with more poison to inflict brain damage, severe health consequences for themselves and bedlam on society with no clear, direct and immediate path to treatment is a Boogieman, not an angel of mercy.

    I venture a guess that history will view safe consumption advocates as the narcissistic compassionate individuals that they are, who have done a tremendous harm to not only the community, but to the individuals they purport to help.

    So let’s raise a glass of mouthwash to the same tired ideas that have led richer and more capable cities than ours into complete anarchy. Decriminalization has led to an increase in deaths, and increased chaos in our cities. I simply cannot take seriously a suggestion that prioritizes more and easier paths to addiction maintenance over treatment and the need for order and safety for all.

    Like

    • The opioid crisis has accelerated exponentially since 2015 but decriminalization only started 15 months ago, so how do you come to blame decriminalization for the increase in drug deaths, particularly since the crisis is happening throughout the country (and beyond) but BC is the only jurisdiction with decriminalization laws?

      Nobody who advocates for safe injection is against treatment, it’s just that we realize that no gov’t will sufficiently invest in it in the coming years, but safe injection sites can help save lives until gov’t comes to terms in paying for treatment sites. It’s a case of, he who fights and runs away, will live to fight another day.

      Like

      • Decriminalization has increased the rate of fatalities. I did not say that it is the sole cause. Follow:

        1. We propose to decriminalize drugs to reduce instances of consumption in a manner that leads to deaths (using alone etc.).

        2. Death rate goes up after decriminalization.

        What can you reasonably conclude from that observation?

        And no, incidents of death are not going up across the board, nor at the same rate. See Alberta. They purport to have a treatment- first approach. Death rates are lower.

        See the example of San Fransisco. The Mayor has come full circle and has now just recently arrested over 100 homeless drug addicts because they did not engage treatment services after nunneries attempts. Society is not here to bankroll your self-inflicted fentanyl joyride and crime spree.

        Mac, how can you have safe supply once the dreadfully powerful new drugs hit the scene? They cannot be made safe. Users will not stick to the old, less lethal drugs. They will want the hardest stuff out there.

        Safe supply is a misnomer. Let’s call it what it is – less lethal supply, and even that is questionable. Supporting people to inflict lasting brain damage to themselves is not compassion.

        I also don’t follow the last line. If there’s money and support for safe supply, and invitation (which is quite a dangerous work environment), surely there can also be money for treatment?

        We just want to see results. Less death. Less street chaos. Some success stories. We aren’t seeing that. Until we do, don’t expect support for proposals that aim to do nothing but focus on addiction maintenance.

        Safe supply makes sense when it’s directly tied to treatment pathways. Unfortunately, the idiots running the show failed to take into account the need of the other half of the equation. Right now, safe supply and decriminalization is doing tremendous harm to people and communities.

        Like

      • Also, decriminalization OFFICIALLY started 15 months ago.m, but it was effectively established long before that through the lack of enforcement by police.

        Sorry for the auto corrections in the longer reply. Should read “inhalation” and there’s another error in there somewhere.

        Like

      • Unknown's avatar Mel Rothenburger // September 5, 2023 at 7:20 AM //

        Nunneries should be numerous? :)

        Like

      • Yes, Mel. You have it right. Curse these old thumbs and these damn phones!

        😂

        Like

Leave a comment